在2011年美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)工作时间规定的背景下保持手术量
Preserving operative volume in the setting of the 2011 ACGME duty hour regulations.
作者信息
Scally Christopher P, Reames Bradley N, Teman Nicholas R, Fritze Danielle M, Minter Rebecca M, Gauger Paul G
机构信息
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
出版信息
J Surg Educ. 2014 Jul-Aug;71(4):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
OBJECTIVES
The reported influence of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident duty hour limitations on operative case volume has been mixed. Additional restrictions instituted in July 2011 further limited the work hours of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents, threatening to reduce availability for educational and operative activities. In this study, we evaluate our novel intern call schedule, which we hypothesized would preserve operative experience despite these increased restrictions.
DESIGN
A retrospective analysis of PGY-1 operative reports was conducted. Operations outside of major case categories were excluded. Operative case volumes in the Section of General Surgery for the same period were analyzed, as were average duty hours for each resident. Comparative statistics were generated using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
SETTING
Single-institution study conducted at the University of Michigan, a tertiary-care academic hospital.
PARTICIPANTS
Overall, 50 categorical general surgery residents from 2005 to present were included. Three residents were subsequently excluded as they were preliminary interns rather than categorical; 2 residents were excluded having completed their intern years at other institutions.
RESULTS
The median number of major cases done during the PGY-1 for all evaluated residents was 89 (interquartile range [IQR]: 72-101). For interns between the years 2005 and 2011, the median number of major cases was 87 (IQR: 73-101), whereas interns in the 2011 to 2013 academic years performed 91.5 (IQR: 69.5-101.5, p = 0.91). Although case volume varied between intern classes, no significant differences were observed between any 2 individual classes in the study. Analysis of annual case volumes among each PGY revealed a relative increase of 29% (p < 0.001) among PGY-2 residents, and 20% (p = 0.02) by PGY-3 residents. Relative increases among senior residents (8% for both PGY-4 and PGY-5) did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS
Our novel call schedule attempts to minimize prolonged night-float coverage responsibilities for interns in hopes of preserving their operative experience. In spite of increased duty hour restrictions, PGY-1 operative volume has not decreased significantly at our institution. However, in the same time period, PGY-2 and PGY-3 case volume has increased. Our findings highlight the challenges faced by surgical residencies in light of these new restrictions, particularly the 16-hour limit. Additional rigorously designed prospective studies should be conducted to better understand the influence of the most recent Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work hour limitations on the subjective and objective experiences of surgical residents.
目的
研究生医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education,ACGME)对住院医师值班时长的限制对手术病例量的影响,相关报道的结果不一。2011年7月实施的额外限制进一步缩短了第一年住院医师(PGY-1)的工作时长,这可能会减少其参与教学和手术活动的机会。在本研究中,我们评估了我们新设计的实习医生值班安排表,我们推测该安排表能够在这些日益严格的限制条件下,仍能保持手术经验。
设计
对PGY-1手术报告进行回顾性分析。排除主要病例类别以外的手术。分析普通外科同期的手术病例量以及每位住院医师的平均值班时长。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较统计。
地点
在密歇根大学(一所三级医疗学术医院)进行的单机构研究。
参与者
总体而言,纳入了2005年至今的50名普通外科住院医师。3名住院医师随后被排除,因为他们是初级实习医生而非普通住院医师;2名在其他机构完成实习年的住院医师也被排除。
结果
所有评估住院医师在PGY-1期间完成的主要病例数中位数为89例(四分位间距[IQR]:72 - 101)。2005年至2011年期间的实习医生,主要病例数中位数为87例(IQR:73 - 101),而2011年至2013学年的实习医生完成了91.5例(IQR:69.5 - 101.5,p = 0.91)。尽管不同实习班级的病例量有所不同,但本研究中任意两个班级之间均未观察到显著差异。对各PGY年度病例量的分析显示,PGY-2住院医师的病例量相对增加了29%(p < 0.001),PGY-3住院医师增加了20%(p = 0.02)。高年资住院医师(PGY-4和PGY-5均增加8%)的相对增加未达到统计学意义。
结论
我们新设计的值班安排表试图尽量减少实习医生长时间的夜间轮值覆盖职责,以期保留他们的手术经验。尽管值班时长限制增加,但在我们机构PGY-1的手术量并未显著下降。然而,在同一时期,PGY-2和PGY-3的病例量有所增加。我们的研究结果凸显了手术住院医师培训在这些新限制下所面临的挑战,尤其是16小时的限制。应开展更多设计严谨的前瞻性研究,以更好地了解ACGME最新工作时长限制对外科住院医师主观和客观经验的影响。