Singler Katrin, Heppner Hans Jürgen, Skutetzky Andreas, Sieber Cornel, Christ Michael, Thiem Ulrich
Department of Geriatrics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.
Gerontology. 2014;60(5):413-9. doi: 10.1159/000358825. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
The identification of patients at high risk for adverse outcomes [death, unplanned readmission to emergency department (ED)/hospital, functional decline] plays an important role in emergency medicine. The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) instrument is one of the most commonly used and best-validated screening tools. As to the authors' knowledge so far there are no data on any screening tool for the identification of older patients at risk for a negative outcome in Germany.
To evaluate the validity of the ISAR screening tool in a German ED.
This was a prospective single-center observational cohort study in an ED of an urban university-affiliated hospital. Participants were 520 patients aged ≥75 years consecutively admitted to the ED.
The German version of the ISAR screening tool was administered directly after triage of the patients. Follow-up telephone interviews to assess outcome variables were conducted 28 and 180 days after the index visit in the ED. The primary end point was death from any cause or hospitalization or recurrent ED visit or change of residency into a long-term care facility on day 28 after the index ED visit.
The mean age ± SD was 82.8 ± 5.0 years. According to ISAR, 425 patients (81.7%) scored ≥2 points, and 315 patients (60.5%) scored ≥3 points. The combined primary end point was observed in 250 of 520 patients (48.1%) on day 28 and in 260 patients (50.0%) on day 180. Using a continuous ISAR score the area under the curve on day 28 was 0.621 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.573-0.669) and 0.661 (95% CI 0.615-0.708) on day 180, respectively.
The German version of the ISAR screening tool acceptably identified elderly patients in the ED with an increased risk of a negative outcome. Using the cutoff ≥3 points instead of ≥2 points yielded better overall results.
识别有不良结局(死亡、非计划再次入住急诊科/医院、功能衰退)高风险的患者在急诊医学中起着重要作用。“老年人风险识别(ISAR)工具”是最常用且验证效果最佳的筛查工具之一。据作者所知,目前在德国尚无关于任何用于识别有不良结局风险的老年患者的筛查工具的数据。
评估ISAR筛查工具在德国急诊科的有效性。
这是一项在城市大学附属医院急诊科进行的前瞻性单中心观察性队列研究。研究对象为520名年龄≥75岁且连续入住该急诊科的患者。
患者分诊后直接使用德语版的ISAR筛查工具。在急诊科首次就诊后28天和180天进行随访电话访谈以评估结局变量。主要终点是在首次急诊科就诊后28天因任何原因死亡、住院、再次就诊急诊科或入住长期护理机构。
平均年龄±标准差为82.8±5.0岁。根据ISAR,425名患者(81.7%)得分≥2分,315名患者(60.5%)得分≥3分。在第28天,520名患者中有250名(48.1%)出现综合主要终点,在第180天有260名患者(50.0%)出现。使用连续的ISAR评分,第28天的曲线下面积为0.621(95%置信区间,CI 0.573 - 0.669),第180天为0.661(95%CI 0.615 - 0.708)。
德语版的ISAR筛查工具能够较好地识别急诊科中有不良结局风险增加的老年患者。使用≥3分而非≥2分的截断值可产生更好的总体结果。