Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术采用全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉后发生术后认知功能障碍的发生率。

Incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after general or spinal anaesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Silbert B S, Evered L A, Scott D A

机构信息

Centre for Anaesthesia and Cognitive Function, Department of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Unit, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Australia

Centre for Anaesthesia and Cognitive Function, Department of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Unit, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2014 Nov;113(5):784-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu163. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since general anaesthesia invariably accompanies surgery, the contribution of each to the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) has been difficult to identify.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was undertaken in elderly patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Between 2005 and 2011, 2706 individuals were screened to recruit 100 eligible patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive general or spinal anaesthesia alone. A battery of eight neuropsychological tests was administered before operation and at 7 days and 3 months after operation. The reliable change index was used to calculate the incidence of POCD. Intention-to-treat analysis was used to compare rates of POCD.

RESULTS

Futility analysis led to stopping of the trial after recruitment of 100 patients. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to general anaesthesia, and 48 patients to spinal anaesthesia without sedation or postoperative opioids. At 3 months, POCD was detected in 6.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-18.7%] of patients in the general anaesthesia group and 19.6% (95% CI: 9.4-33.9%) in the spinal group (P=0.07). At 7 days after operation, the incidence of POCD was 4.1% (95% CI: 0.5-14%) in the general anaesthesia group and 11.9% (95% CI: 4.0-26.6%) in the spinal group (P=0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in the rates of POCD when comparing general anaesthesia with spinal anaesthesia, suggesting that the surgical or procedural process itself may contribute to the development of POCD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN12605000150640.

摘要

背景

由于全身麻醉总是伴随着手术,因此很难确定二者对术后认知功能障碍(POCD)发生发展的各自影响。

方法

对接受体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的老年患者进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。在2005年至2011年期间,对2706人进行了筛查,以招募100名符合条件的患者。患者被随机分配单独接受全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉。在手术前以及术后7天和3个月进行了一系列八项神经心理学测试。使用可靠变化指数来计算POCD的发生率。采用意向性分析来比较POCD的发生率。

结果

在招募了100名患者后,无效性分析导致试验停止。50名患者被随机分配接受全身麻醉,48名患者接受无镇静或术后阿片类药物的脊髓麻醉。在3个月时,全身麻醉组6.8%[95%置信区间(CI):1.4 - 18.7%]的患者检测到POCD,脊髓麻醉组为19.6%(95%CI:9.4 - 33.9%)(P = 0.07)。术后7天,全身麻醉组POCD的发生率为4.1%(95%CI:0.5 - 14%),脊髓麻醉组为11.9%(95%CI:4.0 - 26.6%)(P = 0.16)。

结论

我们发现全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉相比,POCD发生率无显著差异,这表明手术或操作过程本身可能导致POCD的发生。

临床试验注册

澳大利亚临床试验注册编号ACTRN12605000150640。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验