Suppr超能文献

[使用自动RPR试验评估梅毒治疗的血清学反应]

[Evaluation of the serological response to syphilis treatment using an automated RPR test].

作者信息

Itoda Ichiro

出版信息

Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2014 May;88(3):275-81. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.88.275.

Abstract

We evaluated the clinical usefulness of serological monitoring with an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test in syphilis patients. Serum samples were obtained from 68 syphilis patients, including 57 cases infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from our clinic between February 2010 and May 2012. RPR titers were measured with both the conventional serial dilution manual method and the automated method before (baseline) and at several intervals after treatment. The criteria of a cure were defined based on RPR titers as equal to and/or more than a 4-fold decrease (with the manual method) or by RPR values lowered to the level of equal and/or less than 25% (with the automated method) within 6 months in comparison with baseline values. A serological cure was observed in 19 (95%) and 17 (85%) of the 20 cases with the manual method and the automated method after 6 months, respectively. For the other 3 cases, the RPR value ratios with the automated method were 25.4%, 25.9% and 37.9%. Among all 68 patients, 9 cases (13.2%) did not meet the criteria for a cure by both methods within 6 months, but all cases did within 12 months. The ratio of RPR values after several months against that of baseline was evaluated with a t-test; the RPR values with the automated method were significantly lower than those obtained with the manual method (p < 0.05), especially at 1 and 2 months (p < 0.01). The RPR value ratios of HIV-positive cases were significantly higher 1 and 2 months after (with the manual method) and 1 month after (with the automated method) than those of HIV-negative cases; however, no statistical significance was observed after 6 months between the RPR ratio of HIV-positive and HIV-negative cases. Based on these results, we infer that the RPR test with the automated method can be used in the same manner as the manual method for treatment monitoring of HIV-positive and HIV-negative syphilis patients, especially in the early phase of treatment.

摘要

我们评估了梅毒患者血清学监测中自动化快速血浆反应素(RPR)检测的临床实用性。2010年2月至2012年5月期间,我们从68例梅毒患者中采集了血清样本,其中包括57例感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的患者,样本均来自我们的诊所。在治疗前(基线)和治疗后的几个时间点,采用传统的系列稀释手工法和自动化方法测量RPR滴度。治愈标准根据RPR滴度定义为:与基线值相比,6个月内RPR滴度降低4倍及以上(手工法),或RPR值降至等于和/或低于25%(自动化方法)。6个月后,手工法检测的20例患者中有19例(95%)达到血清学治愈,自动化方法检测的20例患者中有17例(85%)达到血清学治愈。另外3例患者,自动化方法检测的RPR值比率分别为25.4%、25.9%和37.9%。在所有68例患者中,9例(13.2%)在6个月内两种方法均未达到治愈标准,但所有患者在12个月内均达到治愈标准。采用t检验评估几个月后RPR值与基线值的比率;自动化方法检测的RPR值显著低于手工法检测的RPR值(p < 0.05),尤其是在1个月和2个月时(p < 0.01)。HIV阳性患者在治疗后1个月(手工法)和2个月(手工法)以及治疗后1个月(自动化方法)的RPR值比率显著高于HIV阴性患者;然而,6个月后HIV阳性和HIV阴性患者的RPR比率之间未观察到统计学差异。基于这些结果,我们推断自动化方法的RPR检测可与手工法以相同方式用于HIV阳性和HIV阴性梅毒患者的治疗监测,尤其是在治疗早期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验