Güler Serkan, Apan Alparslan, Muluk Nuray Bayar, Budak Bilgehan, Oz Goksen, Kose Emine A
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale University, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Turkey.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014 May-Jun;23(3):447-54. doi: 10.17219/acem/37144.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of CO2 insufflation on the pressure of the middle ear cavity (PMEC) during laparoscopic surgery under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol or sevoflurane as an inhalational anesthetic maintenance.
Sixty patients who underwent laparoscopic/or non-laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. For anesthetic maintenance with inhalation agents, 20 non-laparoscopic surgery patients in Group 1 were applied sevoflurane (2-2.5%). Forty patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were randomized into two groups. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (2-2.5%) in twenty patients in Group 2 and the TIVA technique in 20 patients in Group 3. In Group 1, PMEC was measured before anesthesia, 10 and 30 min after endotracheal intubation, 10 min before extubation, and 15, 30, 60 min and 6 hours in the postoperative period. In Group 2 and 3, PMEC was measured before the anesthesia, 10 min after intubation, 10 and 30 min after CO2 insufflation, just before the CO2 elimination, 10 min before the extubation, and 15, 30, 60 min and 6 hours after extubation in the postoperative period.
PMEC was significantly increased in Group 1 at 10 min after intubation, at 30 min of the operation, before extubation, and at postoperative 15 and 30 min (p < 0.05). In Group 3, differences between PMECs were detected at the 30th min of insufflation (p = 0.005), and during elimination (p = 0.035) compared to the initial measurement. Generally, the values remained positive in Group 1 and negative in Group 3. There was a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 3 at 10 min after the induction (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in PMECs between Group 2 and 3 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Our results indicate that, in laparoscopic surgery, TIVA used for the maintenance of anesthesia did not increase the PMEC and the changes caused by sevoflurane were also in the normal range of middle ear pressures. In patients with previous ear surgery, if there is a need of classical surgical procedures in the future, sevoflurane anesthesia should not be the first choice due to its effects on PMEC, which cause it to be increased over 50 daPa, especially at 30 min after intubation. Patient characteristics including previous ear surgery should be considered in selecting the optimum anesthetic agents and technique.
本研究旨在探讨在以丙泊酚或七氟醚作为吸入麻醉维持剂的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)下进行腹腔镜手术期间,二氧化碳气腹对中耳腔压力(PMEC)的影响。
本研究纳入了60例在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜或非腹腔镜手术的患者。对于使用吸入剂进行麻醉维持的情况,第1组的20例非腹腔镜手术患者使用七氟醚(2 - 2.5%)。40例接受腹腔镜手术的患者被随机分为两组。第2组的20例患者使用七氟醚(2 - 2.5%)维持麻醉,第3组的20例患者采用TIVA技术。在第1组中,于麻醉前、气管插管后10分钟和30分钟、拔管前10分钟以及术后15分钟、30分钟、60分钟和6小时测量PMEC。在第2组和第3组中,于麻醉前、插管后10分钟、二氧化碳气腹后10分钟和30分钟、即将停止二氧化碳气腹时、拔管前10分钟以及术后拔管后15分钟、30分钟、60分钟和6小时测量PMEC。
第1组在插管后10分钟、手术30分钟、拔管前以及术后15分钟和30分钟时,PMEC显著升高(p < 0.05)。在第3组中,与初始测量相比,气腹第30分钟时(p = (此处原文似乎有误,推测应为0.005))以及气腹消除期间(p = 0.035)检测到PMEC存在差异。总体而言,第1组的值保持为正,第3组的值保持为负。诱导后10分钟时,第1组和第3组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。接受腹腔镜手术的第2组和第3组患者的PMEC之间无统计学显著差异。
我们的结果表明,在腹腔镜手术中,用于维持麻醉的TIVA不会增加PMEC,并且七氟醚引起的变化也在中耳压力的正常范围内。对于既往有耳部手术史的患者,如果未来需要进行传统外科手术,由于七氟醚对PMEC的影响,尤其是在插管后30分钟时会使其升高超过50 daPa,七氟醚麻醉不应作为首选。在选择最佳麻醉剂和技术时,应考虑包括既往耳部手术史在内的患者特征。