Department of Surgery, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA , USA ; Department of Immunology, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA , USA.
Front Oncol. 2014 Jun 17;4:155. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00155. eCollection 2014.
The concept of oncolytic viral therapy was based on the hypothesis that engineering tumor-selectivity into the replication potential of viruses would permit direct destruction of tumor cells as a result of viral-mediated lysis, resulting in amplification of the therapy exclusively within the tumor environment. The immune response raised by the virus was not only considered to be necessary for the safety of the approach, but also something of a hindrance to optimal therapeutic activity and repeat dosing. However, the pre-clinical and subsequent clinical success of several oncolytic viruses expressing selected cytokines has demonstrated the potential for harnessing the immune response as an additional and beneficial mechanism of therapeutic activity within the platform. Over the last few years, a variety of novel approaches have been incorporated to try to enhance this immunotherapeutic activity. Several innovative and subtle approaches have moved far beyond the expression of a single cytokine transgene, with the hope of optimizing anti-tumor immunity while having minimal detrimental impact on viral oncolytic activity.
溶瘤病毒治疗的概念基于这样一种假设,即将复制潜能的肿瘤选择性工程设计到病毒中,将允许病毒介导的裂解直接破坏肿瘤细胞,从而仅在肿瘤环境中扩增治疗。病毒引起的免疫反应不仅被认为是该方法安全性所必需的,而且对最佳治疗活性和重复给药也有一定的阻碍。然而,几种表达选择的细胞因子的溶瘤病毒的临床前和随后的临床成功证明了利用免疫反应作为治疗平台中额外的有益治疗机制的潜力。在过去的几年中,已经采用了多种新方法来试图增强这种免疫治疗活性。几种创新和微妙的方法已经远远超出了单个细胞因子转基因的表达,希望在对病毒溶瘤活性的最小损害的情况下优化抗肿瘤免疫。