Suppr超能文献

海岸带生态系统服务:从科学到价值和决策;案例研究。

Coastal Zone Ecosystem Services: from science to values and decision making; a case study.

机构信息

Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, UK.

Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2014 Sep 15;493:682-93. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.099. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

Abstract

This research is concerned with the following environmental research questions: socio-ecological system complexity, especially when valuing ecosystem services; ecosystems stock and services flow sustainability and valuation; the incorporation of scale issues when valuing ecosystem services; and the integration of knowledge from diverse disciplines for governance and decision making. In this case study, we focused on ecosystem services that can be jointly supplied but independently valued in economic terms: healthy climate (via carbon sequestration and storage), food (via fisheries production in nursery grounds), and nature recreation (nature watching and enjoyment). We also explored the issue of ecosystem stock and services flow, and we provide recommendations on how to value stock and flows of ecosystem services via accounting and economic values respectively. We considered broadly comparable estuarine systems located on the English North Sea coast: the Blackwater estuary and the Humber estuary. In the past, these two estuaries have undergone major land-claim. Managed realignment is a policy through which previously claimed intertidal habitats are recreated allowing the enhancement of the ecosystem services provided by saltmarshes. In this context, we investigated ecosystem service values, through biophysical estimates and welfare value estimates. Using an optimistic (extended conservation of coastal ecosystems) and a pessimistic (loss of coastal ecosystems because of, for example, European policy reversal) scenario, we find that context dependency, and hence value transfer possibilities, vary among ecosystem services and benefits. As a result, careful consideration in the use and application of value transfer, both in biophysical estimates and welfare value estimates, is advocated to supply reliable information for policy making.

摘要

本研究关注以下环境研究问题

社会-生态系统复杂性,特别是在评估生态系统服务时;生态系统存量和服务流动的可持续性和评估;在评估生态系统服务时纳入规模问题;以及整合来自不同学科的知识以进行治理和决策。在这个案例研究中,我们专注于可以共同提供但在经济方面可以独立评估的生态系统服务:健康的气候(通过碳固存和储存)、食物(通过育苗场的渔业生产)和自然娱乐(自然观察和享受)。我们还探讨了生态系统存量和服务流动的问题,并就如何通过核算和经济价值分别评估生态系统存量和服务流动提供了建议。我们考虑了位于英国北海沿岸的大致可比的河口系统:黑水河口和亨伯河口。过去,这两个河口经历了大规模的土地开垦。管理调整是一种政策,通过该政策,以前声称的潮间带栖息地将被重新创建,从而增强盐沼提供的生态系统服务。在这种情况下,我们通过生物物理估计和福利价值估计来研究生态系统服务价值。使用乐观(扩大沿海生态系统保护)和悲观(例如,由于欧洲政策逆转而失去沿海生态系统)的情景,我们发现,生态系统服务和效益之间存在着上下文相关性,因此存在价值转移的可能性。因此,我们主张在生物物理估计和福利价值估计中谨慎考虑价值转移的使用和应用,以为政策制定提供可靠的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验