Riffel Philipp, Michaely Henrik J, Morelli John N, Pfeuffer Josef, Attenberger Ulrike I, Schoenberg Stefan O, Haneder Stefan
Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim - Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany,
Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2507-12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3287-6. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
To evaluate the feasibility of zoomed diffusion-weighted EPI (z-EPI) in the head and neck in a healthy volunteer population and to compare to conventional single-shot EPI (c-EPI).
Nine volunteers were included in this prospective, IRB-approved study. Examinations were performed on a 3 T-MR system equipped with a two-channel, fully-dynamic parallel transmit array. The acquired sequences consisted of a T2w-TSE, a c-EPI, and two z-EPI acquisitions. For quantitative assessment of distortion artefacts, DW images were fused with T2-TSE images. Misregistration of DW images with T2-TSE images was assessed in the cervical spine. For qualitative assessment, two readers ranked c-EPI and z-EPI sequences in terms of susceptibility artefacts, image blur, and overall imaging preference. ADC values of several anatomical regions were calculated and compared between sequences.
Mean maximum distortion with the c-EPI was 5.9 mm ± 1.6 mm versus 2.4 mm ± 1 mm (p < 0.05) with z-EPI. Both readers found more blur and susceptibility artefacts in every case with c-EPI. No statistically significant differences in calculated ADC values were observed.
z-EPI of the head and neck leads to substantial image quality improvements relative to c-EPI due to a reduction in susceptibility artefacts and image blur.
• Zoomed DWI is feasible in the head and neck. • Image quality improves substantially with zoomed DWI of the neck. • Zoomed DWI exhibits markedly reduced susceptibility artefacts.
评估在健康志愿者群体中进行头颈部位的缩放扩散加权回波平面成像(z-EPI)的可行性,并与传统的单次激发回波平面成像(c-EPI)进行比较。
本前瞻性研究经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,纳入了9名志愿者。检查在配备双通道、全动态并行发射阵列的3T磁共振系统上进行。采集的序列包括T2加权快速自旋回波(T2w-TSE)、c-EPI以及两次z-EPI采集。为了对失真伪影进行定量评估,将扩散加权(DW)图像与T2-TSE图像融合。在颈椎部位评估DW图像与T2-TSE图像的配准误差。为了进行定性评估,两名阅片者根据磁敏感伪影、图像模糊程度以及整体成像偏好对c-EPI和z-EPI序列进行排序。计算并比较了各序列中几个解剖区域的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。
c-EPI的平均最大失真为5.9毫米±1.6毫米,而z-EPI为2.4毫米±1毫米(p<0.05)。两名阅片者均发现,在每种情况下,c-EPI的图像模糊和磁敏感伪影更多。未观察到计算出的ADC值有统计学显著差异。
相对于c-EPI,头颈部位的z-EPI由于磁敏感伪影和图像模糊的减少,使得图像质量有显著提高。
• 缩放扩散加权成像(DWI)在头颈部位是可行的。• 颈部缩放DWI可显著提高图像质量。• 缩放DWI的磁敏感伪影明显减少。