Nawroth Christian, von Borell Eberhard, Langbein Jan
Department of Animal Husbandry and Ecology, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany.
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0777-5. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
Recently, comparative research on the mechanisms and species-specific adaptive values of attributing attentive states and using communicative cues has gained increased interest, particularly in non-human primates, birds, and dogs. Here, we investigate these phenomena in a farm animal species, the dwarf goat (Capra aegagrus hircus). In the first experiment, we investigated the effects of different human head and body orientations, as well as human experimenter presence/absence, on the behaviour of goats in a food-anticipating paradigm. Over a 30-s interval, the experimenter engaged in one of four different postures or behaviours (head and body towards the subject-'Control', head to the side, head and body away from the subject, or leaving the room) before delivering a reward. We found that the level of subjects' active anticipatory behaviour was highest in the control condition and decreased with a decreasing level of attention paid to the subject by the experimenter. Additionally, goats 'stared' (i.e. stood alert) at the experimental set-up for significantly more time when the experimenter was present but paid less attention to the subject ('Head' and 'Back' condition) than in the 'Control' and 'Out' conditions. In a second experiment, the experimenter provided different human-given cues that indicated the location of a hidden food reward in a two-way object choice task. Goats were able to use both 'Touch' and 'Point' cues to infer the correct location of the reward but did not perform above the level expected by chance in the 'Head only' condition. We conclude that goats are able to differentiate among different body postures of a human, including head orientation; however, despite their success at using multiple physical human cues, they fail to spontaneously use human head direction as a cue in a food-related context.
最近,关于归因注意状态和使用交流线索的机制及物种特异性适应价值的比较研究越来越受到关注,尤其是在非人类灵长类动物、鸟类和狗身上。在此,我们在一种农场动物——矮山羊(Capra aegagrus hircus)中研究了这些现象。在第一个实验中,我们在食物预期范式下,研究了不同的人类头部和身体朝向,以及人类实验者在场/不在场对山羊行为的影响。在30秒的时间间隔内,实验者在给予奖励之前会采取四种不同姿势或行为之一(头部和身体朝向受试者——“对照”,头部转向一侧,头部和身体背向受试者,或离开房间)。我们发现,在对照条件下,受试者的主动预期行为水平最高,并且随着实验者对受试者关注度的降低而下降。此外,当实验者在场但对受试者关注较少(“头部”和“背部”条件)时,山羊“凝视”(即警觉站立)实验装置的时间显著长于“对照”和“外出”条件。在第二个实验中,在双向物体选择任务中,实验者提供了不同的人类给予的线索,这些线索表明了隐藏食物奖励的位置。山羊能够使用“触摸”和“指向”线索来推断奖励的正确位置,但在“仅头部”条件下,其表现并未高于随机预期水平。我们得出结论,山羊能够区分人类的不同身体姿势,包括头部朝向;然而,尽管它们成功地使用了多种人类身体线索,但在与食物相关的情境中,它们未能自发地将人类头部方向用作线索。