• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较住院时独居与非独居的急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的长期死亡率。

Comparison of long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention in patients living alone versus not living alone at the time of hospitalization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.029
PMID:24998090
Abstract

Living alone was reported to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. There are, however, limited data on the relation between living alone and all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) AMI registry was a cohort study of patients with AMI enrolled in 26 hospitals in Japan from 2005 through 2007. For the current analysis, we included those patients who underwent PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset, and we assessed their living status to determine if living alone would be an independent prognostic risk factor. Among 4,109 patients eligible for the current analysis of 5,429 patients enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry, 515 patients (12.5%) were living alone at the time of hospital admission. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was 18.3% in the living alone group and 20.1% in the not living alone group (log-rank p = 0.77). After adjusting for potential confounders, risk of the living alone group relative to the not living alone group for all-cause death was not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.02, p = 0.08). In a subgroup analysis stratified by age, the adjusted risk for all-cause death was also not different between the living alone group and the not living alone group both in the older population (aged ≥75 years) and the younger population (aged <75 years). In conclusion, living alone was not associated with higher long-term mortality in patients with AMI who underwent PCI.

摘要

独居与心血管疾病风险增加有关。然而,关于独居与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者全因死亡率之间的关系,数据有限。冠心病再血管化治疗结果研究(CREDO-Kyoto)AMI 注册研究是一项队列研究,纳入了 2005 年至 2007 年日本 26 家医院的 AMI 患者。目前的分析纳入了在症状发作后 24 小时内接受 PCI 的患者,并评估了他们的生活状况,以确定独居是否是独立的预后危险因素。在当前纳入的 5429 名 CREDO-Kyoto AMI 注册患者中的 4109 名患者中,515 名(12.5%)在入院时独居。独居组的 5 年全因死亡率累积发生率为 18.3%,非独居组为 20.1%(对数秩检验,p=0.77)。在校正潜在混杂因素后,独居组与非独居组相比,全因死亡的风险比(adjusted hazard ratio,aHR)并不显著不同(调整后的 HR 为 0.82,95%置信区间为 0.65 至 1.02,p=0.08)。在按年龄分层的亚组分析中,独居组和非独居组的全因死亡调整风险在年龄较大(≥75 岁)和年龄较小(<75 岁)的人群中也没有差异。总之,独居与接受 PCI 的 AMI 患者的长期死亡率升高无关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention in patients living alone versus not living alone at the time of hospitalization.比较住院时独居与非独居的急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的长期死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
2
Effect of preinfarction angina pectoris on long-term survival in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention.梗死前心绞痛对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者长期生存的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 15;114(8):1179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.038. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Clinical efficacy of thrombus aspiration on 5-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.血栓抽吸对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者5年临床结局的临床疗效
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 15;4(6):e001962. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001962.
4
Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (from the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的长期结果(来自 CREDO-Kyoto 注册研究队列-2)。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 15;112(6):767-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
5
Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Heart Failure Hospitalization During Follow-Up After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后随访期间心力衰竭住院的发生率及预后影响
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;119(11):1729-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
7
Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: insight from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时经桡动脉与经股动脉途径的比较:来自CREDO-Kyoto急性心肌梗死注册研究的见解
Heart Vessels. 2017 Dec;32(12):1448-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1021-4. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance vs. Angiographic Guidance in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Long-Term Clinical Outcomes From the CREDO-Kyoto AMI Registry.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导在ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——CREDO-Kyoto急性心肌梗死注册研究的长期临床结局
Circ J. 2016;80(2):477-84. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0870. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Comparison of long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的长期预后(来自 CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 注册研究队列-2)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 1;110(7):924-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
Chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct-related artery is closely associated with increased five-year mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry).非梗死相关动脉慢性完全闭塞与接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者五年死亡率增加密切相关(源自CREDO-Kyoto急性心肌梗死注册研究)。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Feb 3;12(15):e1874-e1882. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00421.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparisons of Patients Living Alone versus Living with Others in Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中独居患者与与他人同住患者的比较。
Int J Angiol. 2023 Apr 12;32(3):179-187. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767697. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Significantly Increased Risk of All-Cause Mortality Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients Living Alone.2型糖尿病独居患者全因死亡率显著增加。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 26;9:782751. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.782751. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic men between living alone and living together.
独居与同住的糖尿病男性急性心肌梗死后中期临床结局的比较
Heart Vessels. 2019 Aug;34(8):1288-1296. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01366-5. Epub 2019 Feb 26.