Imaizumi Atsushi, Liem Anita A, Yang Chun-Fan, Chen Wency, Chen Shih-Heng, Chen Hung-Chi
From the *Department of Plastic Surgery, Prefectural Okinawa Chubu Hospital, Okinawa, Japan; Departments of †Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and ‡Pathology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung; and §Department of Gastroenterology, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):180-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000067.
Esophageal reconstruction can be performed with skin or bowel flaps. The choice of flap remains controversial, as the long-term outcomes of skin flaps cannot always be assessed in patients with limited life expectancies due to advanced malignancy, unlike the pediatric and benign cases which have had esophageal reconstruction using bowel flaps. We report the long-term clinical and histopathological outcomes in a series of 45 cases repaired with combined skin and bowel flaps.Four patients developed symptomatic strictures after corrosive esophageal injuries were repaired with a combination of a tubed free radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap and a pedicled bowel flap. On average, 24 years had passed since uneventful initial esophageal reconstructions. Barium esophagograms were obtained in all cases and pathological examination was performed upon all surgical specimens.The cutaneous portions of the reconstructed esophagus exhibited a variety of findings on barium examination. Each of the 4 cases developed an esophagocutaneous fistula after revision; an average of 4 surgeries was required to close these fistulae. The inner surfaces of the portion of esophagus repaired with skin flaps showed extensive ulceration, polypoid lesions, and fibrosis. Pathology specimens from skin flaps showed extensive acute and chronic inflammation, microabscesses, fibrosis, and acanthosis, with depletion and degeneration of the pilosebaceous units. By contrast, adjacent parts of the esophagus repaired with bowel were widely patent with normal appearing mucosa.Our findings indicate that a bowel flap is durable with good tolerance to gastrointestinal content over long periods, whereas skin flaps often developed morphological changes and could not maintain long-term esophageal function without eventual stricture and dysphagia. We therefore recommend use of bowel flaps for esophageal reconstruction in patients with long life expectancy.
食管重建可采用皮瓣或肠瓣进行。皮瓣的选择仍存在争议,因为与使用肠瓣进行食管重建的儿科和良性病例不同,对于因晚期恶性肿瘤而预期寿命有限的患者,皮瓣的长期效果往往无法评估。我们报告了一系列45例采用联合皮瓣和肠瓣修复的长期临床和组织病理学结果。4例腐蚀性食管损伤患者在采用游离管状桡侧前臂筋膜皮瓣和带蒂肠瓣联合修复后出现有症状的狭窄。自初次食管重建顺利完成以来,平均已过去24年。所有病例均进行了食管钡餐造影,并对所有手术标本进行了病理检查。重建食管的皮肤部分在钡餐检查中表现出多种结果。4例患者在翻修后均发生了食管皮肤瘘;平均需要4次手术来闭合这些瘘管。皮瓣修复的食管部分内表面显示广泛溃疡、息肉样病变和纤维化。皮瓣的病理标本显示广泛的急性和慢性炎症、微脓肿、纤维化和棘皮症,伴有皮脂腺单位的减少和退化。相比之下,肠瓣修复的食管相邻部分通畅良好,黏膜外观正常。我们的研究结果表明,肠瓣耐用,对胃肠道内容物长期耐受性良好,而皮瓣常发生形态学改变,若不最终出现狭窄和吞咽困难,则无法维持长期食管功能。因此,我们建议预期寿命较长的患者在食管重建时使用肠瓣。