• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[草率下结论偏差在妄想形成中的作用]

[The role of the jumping to conclusion bias in delusions formation].

作者信息

Rózycka Jagoda, Prochwicz Katarzyna

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 2013 Nov-Dec;47(6):1041-50.

PMID:25007536
Abstract

The results of many researches indicate that individuals with delusions reveal the reasoning bias. In probabilistic reasoning tasks they reveal hastiness in decision-making. The individuals with delusions request less information than non-deluded individuals, even if additional data is easily available. What is more, they also prove to be convinced to a greater extend of having made the right decision. This finding has been replicated by a number of studies. However, the previous researches have not confirmed the origins of 'jumping to conclusion' bias, and its role in the process of forming delusions has not been yet confirmed. The article in question contains the review of the results of the jumping to conclusion bias in people with delusions. It discusses the main hypotheses explaining the relations between the hasty decision making and the delusions formation. The article also deals with the specifics of 'jumping to conclusion' bias in case of individuals with delusions, as well as summarizes its relation to factors such as the level of intelligence or the intensity of delusion.

摘要

许多研究结果表明,患有妄想症的个体存在推理偏差。在概率推理任务中,他们在决策时表现得很仓促。患有妄想症的个体比没有妄想症的个体所需信息更少,即使额外的数据很容易获取。此外,他们也更坚信自己做出了正确的决定。这一发现已被多项研究所重复。然而,先前的研究尚未证实“急于下结论”偏差的根源,其在妄想形成过程中的作用也尚未得到证实。该文章对患有妄想症的人群中“急于下结论”偏差的研究结果进行了综述。它讨论了解释仓促决策与妄想形成之间关系的主要假设。文章还探讨了患有妄想症个体的“急于下结论”偏差的特点,并总结了其与智力水平或妄想强度等因素的关系。

相似文献

1
[The role of the jumping to conclusion bias in delusions formation].[草率下结论偏差在妄想形成中的作用]
Psychiatr Pol. 2013 Nov-Dec;47(6):1041-50.
2
The jumping-to-conclusions bias in new religious movements.新宗教运动中的急于下结论偏差。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Oct;200(10):868-75. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6eb4.
3
Reasoning anomalies associated with delusions in schizophrenia.精神分裂症妄想相关的推理异常。
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Mar;36(2):321-30. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn069. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
4
Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs.草率下结论与妄想信念的连续体
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1255-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
5
Jumping to delusions? Paranoia, probabilistic reasoning, and need for closure.急于陷入妄想?偏执、概率推理与认知闭合需求。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2007 Jul;12(4):362-76. doi: 10.1080/13546800701203769.
6
Specificity of the jump-to-conclusions bias in deluded patients.妄想症患者中妄下结论偏差的特异性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):239-44. doi: 10.1348/014466507X255294. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
7
'Jumping to conclusions' in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病中的“草率结论”。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;5(1):50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00258.x.
8
Jumping to conclusions and delusion proneness: the impact of emotionally salient stimuli.急于下结论和易产生妄想:情绪突出刺激的影响。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Oct;194(10):760-5. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000239907.83668.aa.
9
Need for closure, jumping to conclusions, and decisiveness in delusion-prone individuals.易产生妄想的个体中的认知闭合需求、草率下结论和决断性。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Jun;194(6):422-6. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000221353.44132.25.
10
A pilot study exploring the contribution of working memory to "jumping to conclusions" in people with first episode psychosis.一项探索工作记忆对首发精神病患者“急于下结论”的影响的试点研究。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2012;17(2):97-114. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2011.569372. Epub 2011 Jul 4.