Rodriguez Hector P, Meredith Lisa S, Hamilton Alison B, Yano Elizabeth M, Rubenstein Lisa V
Hector P. Rodriguez, PhD, MPH, is Associate Professor of Health Policy and Management and Associate Director, Center for Healthcare Organizational and Innovation Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. E-mail:
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Oct-Dec;40(4):286-99. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000036.
Daily clinical team meetings (i.e., "huddles") may be helpful in implementing new roles and responsibilities for patient care because they provide a regular opportunity for member learning and feedback.
We examined how huddles were implemented in the context of the VA patient-centered medical home (PCMH) transformation, including assessing barriers and facilitators to regular huddling among small teams ("teamlets"). We assessed the extent to which teamlet members that huddled had higher self-efficacy for PCMH changes, reported better teamwork experiences, and perceived more supportive practice environments.
METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We used a convergent mixed-methods approach to analyze 79 teamlet member interviews from six VA primary care practices and 418 clinician and staff PCMH survey responses from the six interviewed practices and 13 additional practices in the same region.
Most members reported participating in teamlet huddles when asked in surveys (85%). A minority of interview participants, however, described routine huddling focused on previsit planning that included all members. When members reported routine teamlet huddling, activities included (a) previsit planning, (b) strategizing treatment plans for patients with special or complex needs, (c) addressing daily workflow and communication issues through collective problem solving, and (d) ensuring awareness of what team members do and what actions are happening on the teamlet and in the practice. Primary care providers (PCPs) were least likely to report routine huddling. PCP huddlers reported greater self-efficacy for implementing PCMH changes. All huddlers, irrespective of role, reported better teamwork and more supportive practice climates. The most common barriers to teamlet huddling were limited time and operational constraints.
In order to improve the impact of huddles on patient care, practice leaders should clearly communicate the goals, requirements, and benefits of huddling and provide adequate time and resources to ensure that frontline teams use huddle time to improve patient care.
日常临床团队会议(即“碰头会”)可能有助于为患者护理实施新的角色和职责,因为它们为成员学习和反馈提供了定期机会。
我们研究了在退伍军人事务部以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)转型背景下碰头会是如何实施的,包括评估小团队(“小组”)定期召开碰头会的障碍和促进因素。我们评估了参与碰头会的小组成员在PCMH变革方面是否具有更高的自我效能感,是否报告了更好的团队合作体验,以及是否感受到更具支持性的实践环境。
方法/途径:我们采用了一种收敛性混合方法,分析了来自六个退伍军人事务部初级保健机构的79名小组成员访谈,以及来自这六个接受访谈的机构和同一地区另外13个机构的418名临床医生和工作人员的PCMH调查回复。
大多数成员在调查中被问及是否参与小组碰头会时表示参与过(85%)。然而,少数访谈参与者描述了专注于访前规划且所有成员都参与的常规碰头会。当成员报告有常规小组碰头会时,活动包括:(a)访前规划;(b)为有特殊或复杂需求的患者制定治疗计划策略;(c)通过集体解决问题来处理日常工作流程和沟通问题;(d)确保了解团队成员的工作内容以及小组和机构内正在发生哪些行动。初级保健提供者(PCP)最不可能报告有常规碰头会。参与碰头会的初级保健提供者在实施PCMH变革方面报告了更高的自我效能感。所有参与碰头会的人,无论其角色如何,都报告了更好的团队合作和更具支持性的实践氛围。小组碰头会最常见的障碍是时间有限和运营限制。
为了提高碰头会对患者护理的影响,机构领导应明确传达碰头会的目标、要求和益处,并提供足够的时间和资源,以确保一线团队利用碰头会时间来改善患者护理。