Shah Chirag, Vicini Frank A, Berry Sameer, Julian Thomas B, Wilkinson John Ben, Shaitelman Simona F, Khan Atif, Finkelstein Steven E, Goldstein Neal
*Department of Radiation Oncology, Summa Health System, Akron, OH †Michigan Healthcare Professionals/21st Century Oncology, Farmington Hills, MI ‡Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA §Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Health System, Shreveport, LA ∥University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX ¶Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ #21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium, Scottsdale, AZ **Clarient Laboratory, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;38(5):526-33. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000102.
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast has rapidly increased in incidence over the past several decades secondary to an increased use of screening mammography. Local treatment options for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ include mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy. Although several randomized trials have confirmed a >50% reduction in the risk of local recurrence with the administration of radiation therapy (RT) compared with breast-conserving surgery alone, controversy persists regarding whether or not RT is needed in selected "low-risk" patients. Over the past two decades, two prospective single-arm studies and one randomized trial have been performed and confirm that the omission of RT after surgery is associated with higher rates of local recurrence even after selecting patients with optimal clinical and pathologic features. Importantly, these trials have failed to consistently and reproducibly identify a low-risk cohort of patients (based on clinical and pathologic features) that does not benefit from RT. As a result, adjuvant RT is still advocated in the majority of patients, even in low-risk cases. Future research is moving beyond traditional clinical and pathologic risk factors and instead focusing on approaches such as multigene assays and biomarkers with the hopes of identifying truly low-risk patients who may not require RT. However, recent studies confirm that even low-risk patients identified from multigene assays have higher rates of local recurrence with local excision alone than would be expected with the addition of RT.
在过去几十年中,由于乳腺钼靶筛查的使用增加,乳腺导管原位癌的发病率迅速上升。诊断为导管原位癌的女性的局部治疗选择包括乳房切除术或保乳治疗。尽管多项随机试验证实,与单纯保乳手术相比,放疗(RT)可使局部复发风险降低50%以上,但对于某些“低风险”患者是否需要放疗仍存在争议。在过去二十年中,进行了两项前瞻性单臂研究和一项随机试验,证实即使选择了具有最佳临床和病理特征的患者,术后省略放疗也与较高的局部复发率相关。重要的是,这些试验未能始终如一地、可重复地确定一组(基于临床和病理特征)无法从放疗中获益的低风险患者队列。因此,即使在低风险病例中,大多数患者仍提倡辅助放疗。未来的研究正在超越传统的临床和病理风险因素,转而关注多基因检测和生物标志物等方法,希望识别出可能不需要放疗的真正低风险患者。然而,最近的研究证实,即使是通过多基因检测确定的低风险患者,仅行局部切除后的局部复发率也高于加用放疗时的预期复发率。