Kämppi Leena, Mustonen Harri, Soinila Seppo
Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Feb;22(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0016-6.
This study was designed to identify factors related to delays in pre-hospital management of status epilepticus (SE).
This retrospective study includes all adult (>16 years of age) patients (N = 82) diagnosed with established SE in the Helsinki University Central Hospital emergency department (ED) over 2 years. SE was defined as a clinically observed episode fulfilling one of the following criteria: (1) continuous seizure lasting over 30 min; (2) recurring seizures without return of consciousness between seizures; (3) occurrence of more than four seizures within any 1 h. We collected 15 variables related to SE type, patient, and SE episode from the medical records, defined and calculated six pre-hospital delay parameters and analyzed their relations using univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression models.
In the multivariate regression analysis, the focal SE was significantly associated with a long delay from SE onset to initial treatment (p < 0.05), to diagnosis (p < 0.002), and to anesthesia (p < 0.002). Administration of the initial treatment before emergency medical service arrived was significantly associated with long delay of the first alarm (p < 0.02) and arrival at the first ED (p < 0.04). Primary admission to a healthcare unit other than tertiary hospital caused a significant delay in diagnosis (p < 0.008) and anesthesia (p < 0.02). Surprisingly, univariate analysis revealed that if the SE onset occurred in a healthcare unit, the delays from SE onset to first alarm (p < 0.001), to arrival in first ED (p < 0.001), to arrival in tertiary hospital (p < 0.001), to diagnosis (p < 0.02), and to anesthesia (p < 0.01) were significantly longer than in cases in which SE onset occurred at a public place.
We found remarkable inadequacy in recognition of SE both among laity and medical professionals. There is an obvious need for increasing awareness of imminent SE and optimizing the pre-hospital management of established SE. SE should be considered as a medical emergency comparable with stroke and cardiac infarction and be allocated with similar resources in the pre-hospital management.
本研究旨在确定与癫痫持续状态(SE)院前治疗延迟相关的因素。
这项回顾性研究纳入了在两年期间于赫尔辛基大学中心医院急诊科(ED)被诊断为确诊SE的所有成年患者(>16岁)(N = 82)。SE被定义为符合以下标准之一的临床观察到的发作:(1)持续发作超过30分钟;(2)反复发作且发作期间未恢复意识;(3)在任何1小时内发作超过4次。我们从病历中收集了15个与SE类型、患者及SE发作相关的变量,定义并计算了6个院前延迟参数,并使用单因素分析和多因素线性回归模型分析它们之间的关系。
在多因素回归分析中,局灶性SE与从SE发作到初始治疗(p < 0.05)、到诊断(p < 0.002)以及到麻醉(p < 0.002)的长时间延迟显著相关。在紧急医疗服务到达之前给予初始治疗与首次报警(p < 0.02)和到达首个急诊科(p < 0.04)的长时间延迟显著相关。首次入住非三级医院的医疗机构会导致诊断(p < 0.008)和麻醉(p < 0.02)出现显著延迟。令人惊讶的是,单因素分析显示,如果SE发作发生在医疗机构中,从SE发作到首次报警(p < 0.001)、到到达首个急诊科(p < 0.001)、到到达三级医院(p < 0.001)、到诊断(p < 0.02)以及到麻醉(p < 0.01)的延迟明显长于SE发作发生在公共场所的情况。
我们发现无论是在普通民众还是医疗专业人员中,对SE的认识都存在明显不足。显然需要提高对即将发生的SE 的认识,并优化已确诊SE的院前管理。SE应被视为与中风和心肌梗死相当的医疗急症,并在院前管理中分配类似的资源。