Saccomanno Maristella F, Shin Jason J, Mascarenhas Randy, Haro Marc, Verma Nikhil N, Cole Brian J, Bach Bernard R
Department of Orthopaedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Arthroscopy. 2014 Nov;30(11):1491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
To compare clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using cortical button versus transfemoral suspensory fixation.
This systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook guidelines and PROSPERO registration. Only Level I and II randomized controlled trials comparing cortical button and transfemoral suspensory fixation in hamstring ACL reconstruction were included. A literature search was performed using electronic databases. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool. All outcomes reported by each study were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Dichotomous data were reported as risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I(2).
Five studies involving 317 patients were included. The mean follow-up period was 21.7 ± 7.0 months (range, 12 to 38 months). The mean age of participants was 26.7 ± 1.89 years (range, 16 to 48 years). The Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and IKDC score were compiled. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side differences on KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) testing, and measurements of thigh atrophy, as well as imaging (radiography and computed tomography) to assess for femoral tunnel widening. Pooled statistical analysis was possible only for postoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores. No significant differences were found between the cortical button and transfemoral fixation groups. Included studies did not report differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Radiographic results suggest increased femoral tunnel widening in the cortical button group. However, tunnel widening was not found to affect clinical results.
The present evidence suggests that there are no short- to medium-term differences in knee-specific outcome measures between patients treated with cortical button femoral graft fixation and those treated with suspensory transfemoral fixation when undergoing ACL reconstruction. In addition, radiologic evidence of tunnel widening does not seem to affect short- to medium-term clinical outcomes.
Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.
比较使用皮质纽扣与经股骨悬吊固定进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后的临床和功能结果。
本系统评价按照Cochrane手册指南和PROSPERO注册进行。仅纳入比较腘绳肌ACL重建中皮质纽扣和经股骨悬吊固定的I级和II级随机对照试验。使用电子数据库进行文献检索。使用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。对每项研究报告的所有结果进行评估。主要结局指标为术后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和Lysholm膝关节评分。使用RevMan软件(北欧Cochrane中心,Cochrane协作网,哥本哈根)进行统计分析。二分数据报告为风险比和95%置信区间。使用I²评估异质性。
纳入5项研究,共317例患者。平均随访期为21.7±7.0个月(范围12至38个月)。参与者的平均年龄为26.7±1.89岁(范围16至48岁)。汇总了Lysholm评分、Tegner活动评分和IKDC评分。通过Lachman试验、KT-1000(MEDmetric,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚)测试评估双侧差异、测量大腿萎缩以及成像(X线摄影和计算机断层扫描)来评估股骨隧道增宽,进行临床评估。仅对术后IKDC和Lysholm评分进行汇总统计分析。皮质纽扣组和经股骨固定组之间未发现显著差异。纳入研究未报告两组之间临床结果的差异。影像学结果表明皮质纽扣组股骨隧道增宽增加。然而,未发现隧道增宽影响临床结果。
现有证据表明,在进行ACL重建时,使用皮质纽扣固定股骨移植物治疗的患者与经股骨悬吊固定治疗的患者在膝关节特异性结局指标方面无短期至中期差异。此外,隧道增宽的影像学证据似乎不影响短期至中期临床结果。
II级,I级和II级研究的系统评价。