Suppr超能文献

针对首次精神病发作后大麻使用问题人群的阶段特异性心理治疗:一项随机对照试验。

A phase-specific psychological therapy for people with problematic cannabis use following a first episode of psychosis: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Barrowclough C, Marshall M, Gregg L, Fitzsimmons M, Tomenson B, Warburton J, Lobban F

机构信息

Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health,University of Manchester,Manchester,UK.

Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust,Preston, Lancashire,UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2014 Oct;44(13):2749-61. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000208. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cannabis use is high amongst young people who have recently had their first episode of psychosis, and is associated with worse outcomes. To date, interventions to reduce cannabis consumption have been largely ineffective, and it has been suggested that longer treatment periods are required.

METHOD

In a pragmatic single-blind randomized controlled trial 110 participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: a brief motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy (MI-CBT) intervention (up to 12 sessions over 4.5 months) with standard care from an early intervention service; a long MI-CBT intervention (up to 24 sessions over 9 months) with standard care; or standard care alone. The primary outcome was change in cannabis use as measured by Timeline Followback.

RESULTS

Neither the extended nor the brief interventions conferred benefit over standard care in terms of reductions in frequency or amount of cannabis use. Also the interventions did not result in improvements in the assessed clinical outcomes, including symptoms, functioning, hospital admissions or relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated MI and CBT for people with cannabis use and recent-onset psychosis does not reduce cannabis use or improve clinical outcomes. These findings are consistent with those in the published literature, and additionally demonstrate that offering a more extended intervention does not confer any advantage. Many participants were not at an action stage for change and for those not ready to reduce or quit cannabis, targeting associated problems rather than the cannabis use per se may be the best current strategy for mental health services to adopt.

摘要

背景

在近期首次发作精神病的年轻人中,大麻使用率很高,且与更差的预后相关。迄今为止,减少大麻消费的干预措施大多无效,有人提出需要更长的治疗期。

方法

在一项实用的单盲随机对照试验中,110名参与者被随机分配到三种情况之一:一种简短的动机性访谈和认知行为疗法(MI-CBT)干预(在4.5个月内进行多达12次治疗),同时接受早期干预服务的标准护理;一种长期的MI-CBT干预(在9个月内进行多达24次治疗),同时接受标准护理;或仅接受标准护理。主要结局是通过时间线追溯法测量的大麻使用变化。

结果

就减少大麻使用的频率或数量而言,延长干预和简短干预均未比标准护理带来更多益处。而且,这些干预措施并未使包括症状、功能、住院或复发在内的评估临床结局得到改善。

结论

针对有大麻使用问题和近期发病精神病患者的综合MI和CBT并不能减少大麻使用或改善临床结局。这些发现与已发表文献中的发现一致,此外还表明提供更长时间的干预并无任何优势。许多参与者并未处于改变的行动阶段,对于那些尚未准备好减少或戒除大麻的人而言,针对相关问题而非大麻使用本身可能是心理健康服务目前应采用的最佳策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验