Skirrow C, Ebner-Priemer U, Reinhard I, Malliaris Y, Kuntsi J, Asherson P
MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry,King's College London,UK.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT),Germany.
Psychol Med. 2014 Dec;44(16):3571-83. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001032. Epub 2014 May 15.
Emotional lability (EL), characterized by negative emotional traits and emotional instability, is frequently reported in children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, EL is primarily assessed using retrospective self-report, which is subject to reporting bias and does not consider the potential influence of positive and negative everyday experiences.
Ambulatory assessment was carried out in 41 men with ADHD without co-morbidity, current medication or substance abuse, and 47 healthy control participants. Reports of negative and positive emotions (irritability, frustration, anger, happiness, excitement) and the occurrence of bad and good events were completed eight times daily during a working week. Group differences in emotional intensity and instability were investigated using multilevel models, and explored in relation to bad and good events and the Affective Lability Scale - Short Form (ALS-SF), an EL questionnaire.
The ADHD group reported significantly more frequent bad events, heightened intensity and instability of irritability and frustration, and greater intensity of anger. The results for positive emotions were equivocal or negative. Bad events significantly contributed to the intensity and instability of negative emotions, and showed a stronger influence in the ADHD group. However, covariation for their effect did not eliminate group differences. Small-to-moderate correlations were seen between intensity and instability of negative emotions and the ALS-SF.
Adults with ADHD report heightened intensity and instability of negative emotions in daily life. The results suggest two components of EL in ADHD: a reactive component responsive to bad events and an endogenous component, independent of negative everyday events.
情绪易激惹(EL),以负面情绪特质和情绪不稳定为特征,在患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和成人中经常被报道。然而,EL主要通过回顾性自我报告进行评估,这容易受到报告偏差的影响,并且没有考虑到正负日常经历的潜在影响。
对41名无共病、未服用当前药物或存在药物滥用问题的ADHD男性患者和47名健康对照参与者进行了动态评估。在一个工作日内,每天八次记录负面和正面情绪(易怒、沮丧、愤怒、快乐、兴奋)以及好坏事件的发生情况。使用多级模型研究情绪强度和不稳定性的组间差异,并与好坏事件以及情绪易激惹量表简表(ALS-SF)(一种EL问卷)相关联进行探索。
ADHD组报告的坏事件明显更频繁,易怒和沮丧的强度和不稳定性更高,愤怒强度更大。正面情绪的结果不明确或为负面。坏事件对负面情绪的强度和不稳定性有显著影响,并且在ADHD组中影响更强。然而,其效应的协变量并未消除组间差异。负面情绪的强度和不稳定性与ALS-SF之间存在小到中等程度的相关性。
患有ADHD的成年人在日常生活中报告负面情绪的强度和不稳定性更高。结果表明ADHD中EL的两个组成部分:对坏事件做出反应的反应性成分和独立于负面日常事件的内源性成分。