癌症支出与责任医疗组织:来自医师团体执业示范项目的证据。
Cancer spending and accountable care organizations: Evidence from the Physician Group Practice Demonstration.
作者信息
Colla Carrie H, Lewis Valerie A, Gottlieb Daniel J, Fisher Elliott S
出版信息
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec 1;1(3-4):100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.05.005.
BACKGROUND
Although accountable care organizations (ACOs) are rapidly being deployed in Medicare, little is known about how the model might affect high-risk, high cost groups such as cancer patients. The Physician Group Practice Demonstration, which ran from 2005 to 2010 in 10 physician groups, provides the best current evidence on the likely effectiveness of accountable care organizations for Medicare beneficiaries. Changes in cancer treatment and spending under this program may be indicative of cancer treatment under ACO payment reform.
METHODS
Using Medicare fee-for-service claims data, regression analysis was used to estimate changes in payments for cancer patients using a difference-in-difference design comparing pre- (2001-2004) and post-intervention (2005-2009) trends in spending on cancer patients in PGPD participants to local control groups.
RESULTS
Regression models indicate the Physician Group Practice Demonstration was associated with average Medicare spending reductions per cancer patient of $721 annually across participating sites, an annual 3.9% reduction in payments per patient. Savings derived entirely from reductions in acute care payments for inpatient stays. The Demonstration was also associated with a reduction in mortality among cancer patients. There was no significant change in the proportion of deaths occurring in the hospital. There were significant reductions in hospice use, hospital discharges and ICU days, but no reductions in cancer-specific procedures or chemotherapy. Estimates of all measures varied considerably across participating sites.
CONCLUSIONS
The Physician Group Practice Demonstration was associated with reductions in admissions for inpatient care among beneficiaries with prevalent cancer, with no adverse effect on mortality. Participants in the Physician Group Practice Demonstration did not change the trajectory of spending for cancer-specific treatments.
IMPLICATIONS
Inpatient care for beneficiaries with cancer may represent a significant source of potential savings for ACOs, but evidence from the Physician Group Practice Demonstration indicates that no changes were made to cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or surgical procedures.
背景
尽管责任医疗组织(ACO)正在医疗保险中迅速推广,但对于该模式如何影响癌症患者等高风险、高成本群体却知之甚少。2005年至2010年在10个医生团体中开展的医生团体执业示范项目,为责任医疗组织对医疗保险受益人的可能效果提供了当前最好的证据。该项目下癌症治疗和支出的变化可能预示着ACO支付改革下的癌症治疗情况。
方法
利用医疗保险按服务付费的索赔数据,采用双重差分设计的回归分析,比较PGPD参与者中癌症患者在干预前(2001 - 2004年)和干预后(2005 - 2009年)的支出趋势与当地对照组,以估计癌症患者支付的变化。
结果
回归模型表明,医生团体执业示范项目使参与站点的每位癌症患者每年的医疗保险平均支出减少721美元,每位患者的支付每年减少3.9%。节省完全来自住院急性护理支付的减少。该示范项目还与癌症患者死亡率的降低相关。在医院发生的死亡比例没有显著变化。临终关怀使用、医院出院和重症监护病房天数有显著减少,但癌症特异性手术或化疗没有减少。所有指标的估计在参与站点之间差异很大。
结论
医生团体执业示范项目与患有现患癌症的受益人住院护理入院人数减少相关,对死亡率没有不利影响。医生团体执业示范项目的参与者没有改变癌症特异性治疗的支出轨迹。
启示
癌症受益人的住院护理可能是ACO潜在节省的重要来源,但医生团体执业示范项目的证据表明,化疗或手术等癌症治疗没有改变。