Lefevre N, Bohu Y, de Pamphilis O, Klouche S, Devaux C, Herman S
Clinique du Sport Paris V, 75005 Paris, France; Institut de l'Appareil Locomoteur Nollet, 75017 Paris, France; Clinique Maussins-Nollet, 75019 Paris, France.
Clinique du Sport Paris V, 75005 Paris, France; Institut de l'Appareil Locomoteur Nollet, 75017 Paris, France; Clinique Maussins-Nollet, 75019 Paris, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Sep;100(5):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of outpatient surgery in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that if the patient underwent the procedure within a dedicated organization, safety would be ensured.
A non-randomized, prospective, comparative, single-operator study conducted in 2012-2013 included all patients undergoing first-line surgery for ACL arthroscopic reconstruction using a short hamstring graft. The outpatient group (OP) included patients who were eligible for outpatient surgery and provided consent; the conventional hospitalization group (CH) comprised those patients not suitable for outpatient surgery and those who refused it. The main evaluation criterion was failure of the admission modality defined as hospitalization of a patient who had undergone outpatient surgery or rehospitalization in the first week after discharge. The secondary evaluation criteria were the rate of postoperative complications, postoperative pain, use of analgesics, and patient satisfaction. A total of 138 patients were included: 71 in the OP group and 67 in the CH group, with a mean age of 29.6±9 years. Twenty-nine percent of the patients refused outpatient surgery. In the CH group, the mean hospital stay lasted 2.7±0.8 days.
One patient in the OP group was hospitalized with localized bleeding and there were no rehospitalizations. Six early postoperative complications were noted in each group. The mean postoperative pain on D0-D4 and patient satisfaction were similar in the two groups.
This prospective study encountered no serious events after outpatient ACL reconstruction surgery. In a selected population, the risks are comparable to those in conventional hospitalization.
Level III, comparative study.
本研究的主要目的是评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建门诊手术的可行性。我们假设,如果患者在专门的机构接受该手术,安全性将得到保障。
2012年至2013年进行的一项非随机、前瞻性、对比性、单术者研究纳入了所有接受短绳肌移植物ACL关节镜重建一线手术的患者。门诊组(OP)包括符合门诊手术条件并签署同意书的患者;传统住院组(CH)包括不适合门诊手术或拒绝门诊手术的患者。主要评估标准是入院方式失败,定义为接受门诊手术的患者住院或出院后第一周再次住院。次要评估标准是术后并发症发生率、术后疼痛、镇痛药使用情况和患者满意度。共纳入138例患者:OP组71例,CH组67例,平均年龄29.6±9岁。29%的患者拒绝门诊手术。CH组的平均住院时间为2.7±0.8天。
OP组有1例患者因局部出血住院,无再次住院情况。两组均记录到6例早期术后并发症。两组术后第0至4天的平均疼痛程度和患者满意度相似。
这项前瞻性研究表明,ACL重建门诊手术后未发生严重事件。在特定人群中,风险与传统住院相当。
III级,对比研究。