Sum-Ping S T, Mehta M P, Anderton J M
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
Anesth Analg. 1989 Nov;69(5):627-32.
The trachea and esophagus of 21 patients were simultaneously intubated to comparatively evaluate methods for detecting esophageal intubation. In succession, the trachea and esophagus were ventilated with the same inspiratory volume of 621 +/- 45 mL (mean +/- SD). Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, volumes, and temperatures of expired gas were measured from the tracheal and esophageal tubes. End-expired CO2 levels of gases from the trachea and esophagus were 4.9 +/- 0.7% and 0.6 +/- 0.6%, respectively, with CO2 waveforms observed in 7 (33%) patients with esophageal intubations. Volumes expired from the tracheal tube averaged 615 +/- 64 mL and from the esophageal tube 35 +/- 16 mL (P less than 0.001). Peak temperatures of expired gas recorded from the tracheal tube (32.0 +/- 0.73 degrees C) were higher than those from the esophageal tube (27.3 +/- 1.2 degrees C) (P less than 0.001). The shape of temperature waveforms with a correctly placed tracheal tube remained constant with each ventilation, contrary to that obtained from an esophageal tube. Although the occasional detected of CO2 waveforms from an esophageal tube might lead to an incorrect assessment of tube placement, this limitation of CO2 analyzer can be offset by measurement of volume and temperature of expired gas in identifying placement of an endotracheal tube.
对21例患者的气管和食管同时进行插管,以比较评估检测食管插管的方法。随后,以相同的621±45 mL(平均值±标准差)吸气量对气管和食管进行通气。测量气管导管和食管导管呼出气体的二氧化碳(CO2)水平、体积和温度。气管和食管呼出气体的呼气末CO2水平分别为4.9±0.7%和0.6±0.6%,7例(33%)食管插管患者观察到CO2波形。气管导管呼出的平均体积为615±64 mL,食管导管呼出的平均体积为35±16 mL(P<0.001)。气管导管记录的呼出气体峰值温度(32.0±0.73℃)高于食管导管(27.3±1.2℃)(P<0.001)。气管导管位置正确时,温度波形的形状在每次通气时保持不变,这与食管导管的情况相反。虽然偶尔从食管导管检测到CO2波形可能会导致对导管位置的错误评估,但在识别气管内导管位置时,通过测量呼出气体的体积和温度可以弥补CO2分析仪的这一局限性。