Shankaran Veena, Mummy David, Koepl Lisel, Bansal Aasthaa, Mirick Dana K, Yu Elaine, Morlock Rob, Ogale Sarika, Ramsey Scott D
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA; School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Outcomes, Research, and Policy Program School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA; School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Outcomes, Research, and Policy Program School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Oncologist. 2014 Aug;19(8):892-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0209. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
The objective of this study was to investigate clinical effectiveness and incremental lifetime costs associated with first-line bevacizumab in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Patients diagnosed with mCRC in 2004-2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and stratified by first-line treatment (no chemotherapy [CTx], CTx alone, CTx plus bevacizumab). The impact of first-line bevacizumab on survival was investigated using a propensity score adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Mean lifetime costs for each cohort were calculated using Medicare claims for all services rendered between diagnosis and end of follow-up, adjusting for death and censoring.
A total of 4,414 patients (mean age: 77.3 years) were identified, of whom 15% received first-line bevacizumab. Among first-line-treated patients, bevacizumab receipt was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.85 [95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.97]; p = .013), and this benefit was limited to patients who received >1 month of bevacizumab therapy. Median and mean survival were greatest in patients treated with CTx plus bevacizumab relative to CTx alone (CTx plus bevacizumab median 19.4 months [mean 28.0 months] vs. CTx alone median 15.1 months [mean 22.9 months]; p < .001), as were mean lifetime costs (mean per patient cost $143,284 vs. $111,280). Compared with CTx alone, CTx plus bevacizumab was associated with a 5.1-month increase in mean survival and a $32,004 increase in mean lifetime treatment costs, with an incremental cost of $75,303 per life-year gained.
Bevacizumab use is associated with longer survival than CTx alone in older patients treated in real-world clinical settings, at an incremental cost of $75,303 per life-year gained.
本研究的目的是调查一线使用贝伐单抗治疗老年转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的临床疗效及终生增量成本。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据库中识别出2004年至2007年诊断为mCRC的患者,并根据一线治疗方法进行分层(无化疗[CTx]、单纯CTx、CTx联合贝伐单抗)。使用倾向评分调整的多变量Cox比例风险模型研究一线使用贝伐单抗对生存的影响。使用医疗保险对诊断至随访结束期间提供的所有服务的索赔数据,对每个队列的平均终生成本进行计算,并对死亡和删失情况进行调整。
共识别出4414例患者(平均年龄:77.3岁),其中15%接受一线贝伐单抗治疗。在一线治疗的患者中,接受贝伐单抗治疗与总体生存率提高相关(风险比:0.85[95%置信区间:0.75-0.97];p = 0.013),且这种益处仅限于接受贝伐单抗治疗超过1个月的患者。与单纯CTx治疗的患者相比,CTx联合贝伐单抗治疗的患者中位生存期和平均生存期最长(CTx联合贝伐单抗中位生存期19.4个月[平均28.0个月],单纯CTx中位生存期15.1个月[平均22.9个月];p < 0.001),平均终生成本也是如此(每位患者平均成本143,284美元对111,280美元)。与单纯CTx相比,CTx联合贝伐单抗治疗使平均生存期增加5.1个月,平均终生治疗成本增加32,0,4美元,每获得一个生命年的增量成本为75,303美元。
在真实临床环境中接受治疗的老年患者中,使用贝伐单抗比单纯使用CTx可延长生存期,每获得一个生命年的增量成本为75,303美元。