Myer Charles M, Johnson Christopher M, Postma Gregory N, Weinberger Paul M
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):167-70. doi: 10.1002/lary.24861. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Suture closure and fibrin glue placement have been advocated as alternatives to healing by secondary intention. The aim of this study was to examine the tensile strength of these microflap closure techniques.
Basic research.
Three pairs of excised bovine true vocal folds underwent microflap creation and closure by either single 6-0 polyglactin suture or fibrin glue. Vocal folds were distracted to failure on a universal testing system. Excised porcine true vocal folds underwent microflap creation and were closed with either single 6-0 polyglactin suture or fibrin glue, or were left without closure. Tensile strength testing was performed with a universal testing system measuring load at 1 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm of distraction.
The bovine vocal fold model failed after an average extension of 22.6 mm (range, 21.4-23.9 mm) corresponding to 11.61 N (range, 8.04-13.47 N), with no failure of the suture prior to model failure. Fibrin glue did not demonstrate any measureable resistance to tension application. In the porcine vocal fold model, there was a significant difference between the median tensile load of suture closure (2.91 N) and no closure (1.16 N) at 10 mm of distraction (P = .01). There was no significant difference in median load of vocal folds undergoing fibrin glue closure or no closure.
There is no significant difference in tensile strength of a microflap closed with fibrin glue or not closed. Suture closure of a microflap provides a significantly stronger mechanical closure than no closure. This suggests that use of fibrin glue is of little benefit on the vocal folds.
目的/假设:缝线闭合和纤维蛋白胶粘贴已被提倡作为二期愈合的替代方法。本研究的目的是检验这些显微瓣闭合技术的抗张强度。
基础研究。
三对切除的牛真声带进行显微瓣制作,并用单根6-0聚乙醇酸缝线或纤维蛋白胶进行闭合。在通用测试系统上对声带进行牵拉直至破裂。切除的猪真声带进行显微瓣制作,并用单根6-0聚乙醇酸缝线或纤维蛋白胶进行闭合,或不进行闭合。使用通用测试系统在牵拉1毫米、5毫米和10毫米时测量负荷,进行抗张强度测试。
牛声带模型在平均延伸22.6毫米(范围为21.4-23.9毫米)后破裂,相当于11.61牛(范围为8.04-13.47牛),在模型破裂前缝线未出现断裂。纤维蛋白胶在施加张力时未显示出任何可测量的阻力。在猪声带模型中,在牵拉10毫米时,缝线闭合组(2.91牛)和未闭合组(1.16牛)的中位抗张负荷之间存在显著差异(P = 0.01)。纤维蛋白胶闭合组和未闭合组的中位负荷无显著差异。
用纤维蛋白胶闭合或未闭合的显微瓣在抗张强度上无显著差异。显微瓣的缝线闭合提供了比不闭合显著更强的机械闭合。这表明在声带上使用纤维蛋白胶益处不大。