White B A, Antczak-Bouckoms A A, Weinstein M C
Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
J Dent Educ. 1989 Nov;53(11):646-57.
Community water fluoridation has long been recognized as an effective public health intervention in the prevention of dental caries. The recently documented secular decline in dental caries, however, presents for policy makers the challenge of appropriately allocating limited health care resources between a variety of health care programs. Appropriate economic assessment of these alternatives becomes critical for rational distribution of such resources. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are techniques that, when used correctly, can guide policy makers facing such decisions. This paper reviews and critiques the published literature assessing the cost effectiveness and cost benefit of community water fluoridation using criteria developed for economic evaluation. Eight papers met the criteria for inclusion in the present study. In general, the articles failed to incorporate the declining prevalence of dental caries into their analyses and to fully document costs associated with water fluoridation. Treatment savings from dental care averted secondary to water fluoridation were not appropriately incorporated into the cost-effectiveness analyses, thereby overestimating the marginal cost associated with fluoridation. Specification of outcome measures to assess the consequences of water fluoridation failed to incorporate the dynamic nature of dental disease. Suggestions for improving the generalizability and usefulness of future cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are made.
长期以来,社区水氟化一直被视为预防龋齿的一种有效的公共卫生干预措施。然而,最近记录的龋齿患病率长期下降,给政策制定者带来了在各种医疗保健项目之间合理分配有限医疗资源的挑战。对这些替代方案进行适当的经济评估对于合理分配此类资源至关重要。成本效益分析和成本效果分析是一些技术,若正确使用,可指导面临此类决策的政策制定者。本文使用为经济评估制定的标准,对已发表的评估社区水氟化成本效益和成本效果的文献进行了综述和批判。八篇论文符合纳入本研究的标准。总体而言,这些文章未能将龋齿患病率的下降纳入其分析,也未能充分记录与水氟化相关的成本。因水氟化而避免的牙科护理治疗节省未被适当地纳入成本效果分析,从而高估了与氟化相关的边际成本。评估水氟化后果的结果指标规范未能考虑到牙科疾病的动态性质。本文还提出了改进未来成本效益分析和成本效果分析的普遍性和实用性的建议。