Poullis Michael
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;19(5):726-33. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu253. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
EuroSCORE II, despite improving on the original EuroSCORE system, has not solved all the calibration and predictability issues. Recursive, non-linear and mixed recursive and non-linear regression analysis were assessed with regard to sensitivity, specificity and predictability of the original EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II systems.
The original logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and recursive, non-linear and mixed recursive and non-linear regression analyses of these risk models were assessed via receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic analysis with regard to the accuracy of predicting in-hospital mortality. Analysis was performed for isolated coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) (n = 2913), aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 814), mitral valve surgery (n = 340), combined AVR and CABG (n = 517), aortic (n = 350), miscellaneous cases (n = 642), and combinations of the above cases (n = 5576).
The original EuroSCORE had an ROC below 0.7 for isolated AVR and combined AVR and CABG. None of the methods described increased the ROC above 0.7. The EuroSCORE II risk model had an ROC below 0.7 for isolated AVR only. Recursive regression, non-linear regression, and mixed recursive and non-linear regression all increased the ROC above 0.7 for isolated AVR. The original EuroSCORE had a Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic that was above 0.05 for all patients and the subgroups analysed. All of the techniques markedly increased the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The EuroSCORE II risk model had a Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic that was significant for all patients (P < 0.0001), and very close to significant for isolated CABG (P = 0.05) and for isolated AVR (P = 0.06). Non-linear regression failed to improve on the original Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The mixed recursive and non-linear regression using the EuroSCORE II risk model was the only model that produced an ROC of 0.7 or above for all patients and procedures and had a Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic that was highly non-significant.
The original EuroSCORE and the EuroSCORE II risk models do not have adequate ROC and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics to allow accurate assessment of cardiac surgeons in the modern era. A mixed recursive and non-linear regression model utilizing the EuroSCORE II risk model improves both the ROC and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics.
欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)尽管在原始的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)基础上有所改进,但仍未解决所有校准和可预测性问题。针对原始EuroSCORE和EuroSCORE II系统的敏感性、特异性和可预测性,对递归、非线性以及混合递归和非线性回归分析进行了评估。
通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和霍斯默-莱梅肖统计分析,评估这些风险模型的原始逻辑EuroSCORE、EuroSCORE II以及递归、非线性和混合递归和非线性回归分析在预测院内死亡率方面的准确性。对单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)(n = 2913)、主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)(n = 814)、二尖瓣手术(n = 340)、AVR和CABG联合手术(n = 517)、主动脉手术(n = 350)、杂项病例(n = 642)以及上述病例的组合(n = 5576)进行了分析。
原始EuroSCORE在单纯AVR以及AVR和CABG联合手术中的ROC低于0.7。所描述的方法均未使ROC提高到0.7以上。仅在单纯AVR中,EuroSCORE II风险模型的ROC低于0.7。对于单纯AVR,递归回归、非线性回归以及混合递归和非线性回归均使ROC提高到了0.7以上。原始EuroSCORE在所有患者以及所分析的亚组中的霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量均高于0.05。所有技术均显著提高了霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量。EuroSCORE II风险模型在所有患者中的霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量具有显著性(P < 0.0001),在单纯CABG(P = 0.05)和单纯AVR(P = 0.06)中非常接近显著性。非线性回归未能改善原始的霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量。使用EuroSCORE II风险模型的混合递归和非线性回归是唯一一种在所有患者和手术中产生的ROC为0.7或更高且霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量高度无显著性的模型。
原始EuroSCORE和EuroSCORE II风险模型没有足够的ROC和霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量来准确评估现代心脏外科医生。利用EuroSCORE II风险模型的混合递归和非线性回归模型同时改善了ROC和霍斯默-莱梅肖统计量。