Huang Cheng-Ya, Zhao Chen-Guang, Hwang Ing-Shiou
School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan; Physical Therapy Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
Dual-task performance is strongly affected by the direction of attentional focus. This study investigated neural control of a postural-suprapostural procedure when postural focus strategy varied. Twelve adults concurrently conducted force-matching and maintained stabilometer stance with visual feedback on ankle movement (visual internal focus, VIF) and on stabilometer movement (visual external focus, VEF). Force-matching error, dynamics of ankle and stabilometer movements, and event-related potentials (ERPs) were registered. Postural control with VEF caused superior force-matching performance, more complex ankle movement, and stronger kinematic coupling between the ankle and stabilometer movements than postural control with VIF. The postural focus strategy also altered ERP temporal-spatial patterns. Postural control with VEF resulted in later N1 with less negativity around the bilateral fronto-central and contralateral sensorimotor areas, earlier P2 deflection with more positivity around the bilateral fronto-central and ipsilateral temporal areas, and late movement-related potential commencing in the left frontal-central area, as compared with postural control with VIF. The time-frequency distribution of the ERP principal component revealed phase-locked neural oscillations in the delta (1-4Hz), theta (4-7Hz), and beta (13-35Hz) rhythms. The delta and theta rhythms were more pronounced prior to the timing of P2 positive deflection, and beta rebound was greater after the completion of force-matching in VEF condition than VIF condition. This study is the first to reveal the neural correlation of postural focusing effect on a postural-suprapostural task. Postural control with VEF takes advantage of efficient task-switching to facilitate autonomous postural response, in agreement with the "constrained-action" hypothesis.
双任务表现受到注意力焦点方向的强烈影响。本研究调查了姿势焦点策略变化时,姿势-超姿势程序的神经控制。12名成年人同时进行力匹配,并在踝关节运动视觉反馈(视觉内部焦点,VIF)和稳定仪运动视觉反馈(视觉外部焦点,VEF)下保持稳定仪站姿。记录力匹配误差、踝关节和稳定仪运动动力学以及事件相关电位(ERP)。与VIF姿势控制相比,VEF姿势控制导致更好的力匹配表现、更复杂的踝关节运动以及踝关节和稳定仪运动之间更强的运动学耦合。姿势焦点策略也改变了ERP的时空模式。与VIF姿势控制相比,VEF姿势控制导致双侧额中央和对侧感觉运动区周围N1波潜伏期延长且负性减弱,双侧额中央和同侧颞区周围P2波偏转提前且正性增强,以及从左额中央区开始的晚期运动相关电位。ERP主成分的时频分布显示在δ(1-4Hz)、θ(4-7Hz)和β(13-35Hz)节律中有锁相神经振荡。在P2正性偏转时刻之前,δ和θ节律更为明显,并且在VEF条件下力匹配完成后β反弹比VIF条件下更大。本研究首次揭示了姿势焦点对姿势-超姿势任务影响的神经相关性。与“受限动作”假说一致,VEF姿势控制利用高效的任务切换来促进自主姿势反应。