Bates Michael F, Tolley Krystal A, Edwards Shelley, Davids Zoë, Da Silva Jessica M, Branch William R
Department of Herpetology, National Museum, P.O. Box 266, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa; Email:
Applied Biodiversity Research Division, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa; and Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa; Email:
Zootaxa. 2013 Dec 23;3750:465-93. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3750.5.3.
We constructed a molecular phylogeny of the African plated lizard family Gerrhosauridae using two mitochondrial markers (ND2, 732 bp; 16S, 576 bp) and one nuclear marker (PRLR, 538 bp). This analysis showed that the subfamily Gerrhosaurinae consists of five major clades which we interpret as representing five genera. The genera Tetradactylus and Cordylosaurus were each recovered as monophyletic, but Gerrhosaurus as currently conceived is paraphyletic, consisting of three distinct genus-level assemblages. The two clades consisting of Gerrhosaurus major Duméril, 1851 and Gerrhosaurus validus Smith, 1849 are both described here as new genera, namely Broadleysaurus Bates & Tolley gen. nov. and Matobosaurus Bates & Tolley gen. nov., respectively. Two subspecies of 'Gerrhosaurus major' that were historically separated on the basis of differences in colour pattern are not reciprocally monophyletic, so Gerrhosaurus bottegoi Del Prato, 1895 is relegated to the synonomy of Broadleysaurus major (Duméril, 1851) comb. nov., which is rendered monotypic. Gerrhosaurus validus maltzahni De Grys, 1938 is genetically and morphologically well differentiated from G. v. validus and the two taxa also occur in allopatry. We therefore re-instate the former as Matobosaurus maltzahni (De Grys, 1938) comb. nov., rendering Matobosaurus validus (Smith, 1849) comb. nov. a monotypic species. Our analysis also showed that Gerrhosaurus sensu stricto comprises two major subclades, one consisting of Gerrhosaurus typicus (Smith, 1837) + Gerrhosaurus skoogi Andersson, 1916, and the other containing the remaining species. In this latter subclade we show that west-Central African Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus Hallowell, 1857 is most closely related to Gerrhosaurus auritus Boettger, 1887 rather than to G. nigrolineatus from East and Southern Africa. The west-Central African clade of G. nigrolineatus differs from the East and Southern African clade by a p-distance of 13.0% (ND2) and 6.9% (16S), and can be differentiated morphologically. We accordingly apply the name Gerrhosaurus intermedius Lönnberg, 1907 comb. nov. to populations from Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique, Zimbabwe and South Africa previously identified under the name G. nigrolineatus. Our analysis also confirms that Gerrhosaurus bulsi Laurent, 1954 is a distinct species and sister taxon to a clade containing G. nigrolineatus, G. auritus and G. intermedius. The latter four taxa form a closely-related 'G. nigrolineatus species complex' with a widespread distribution in Africa. Most closely related to this complex of species is Gerrhosaurus flavigularis Wiegmann, 1828 which has an extensive range in East and Southern Africa, and displays genetic substructure which requires further investigation. The status of Gerrhosaurus multilineatus Bocage, 1866, and Angolan populations referred to G. nigrolineatus, remains problematic.
我们利用两个线粒体标记(ND2,732 bp;16S,576 bp)和一个核标记(PRLR,538 bp)构建了非洲盾板蜥蜴科(Gerrhosauridae)的分子系统发育树。该分析表明,盾板蜥蜴亚科(Gerrhosaurinae)由五个主要分支组成,我们将其解释为代表五个属。四趾蜥属(Tetradactylus)和绳蜥属(Cordylosaurus)各自被恢复为单系类群,但当前所认定的盾板蜥属(Gerrhosaurus)是并系的,由三个不同的属级类群组成。由1851年的杜美尔大盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus major Duméril)和1849年的史密斯盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus validus Smith)组成的两个分支在此均被描述为新属,分别为布罗德利蜥属(Broadleysaurus Bates & Tolley gen. nov.)和马托蜥属(Matobosaurus Bates & Tolley gen. nov.)。历史上基于颜色模式差异而被区分的‘杜美尔大盾板蜥’的两个亚种并非相互单系的,因此1895年的博特戈伊盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus bottegoi Del Prato)被归并为布罗德利大盾板蜥(Broadleysaurus major (Duméril, 1851) comb. nov.)的同物异名,后者成为单型种。1938年的德格里斯马氏盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus validus maltzahni De Grys)在遗传和形态上与指名亚种明显不同,且这两个分类单元也分布于异域。因此,我们将前者恢复为马托马氏蜥(Matobosaurus maltzahni (De Grys, 1938) comb. nov.),使指名马托蜥(Matobosaurus validus (Smith, 1849) comb. nov.)成为单型种。我们的分析还表明,狭义的盾板蜥属包括两个主要分支,一个由1837年的典型盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus typicus (Smith)) + 1916年的斯科吉盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus skoogi Andersson)组成,另一个包含其余物种。在这后一个分支中,我们表明,中非西部的1857年的黑纹盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus Hallowell)与1887年的耳状盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus auritus Boettger)关系最为密切,而非与来自东非和南非的黑纹盾板蜥。中非西部的黑纹盾板蜥分支与东非和南非的分支在ND2基因上的p距离为13.0%,在16S基因上为6.9%,且在形态上也可区分。因此,我们将肯尼亚、乌干达、卢旺达、坦桑尼亚、马拉维、莫桑比克、津巴布韦和南非以前被鉴定为黑纹盾板蜥的种群应用1907年的中间盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus intermedius Lönnberg)的新组合名称。我们的分析还证实,1954年的布尔西盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus bulsi Laurent)是一个独特的物种,并且是包含黑纹盾板蜥、耳状盾板蜥和中间盾板蜥的一个分支的姐妹分类单元。后四个分类单元形成了一个分布广泛的紧密相关的‘黑纹盾板蜥物种复合体’。与这个物种复合体关系最密切的是1828年的黄喉盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus flavigularis Wiegmann),它在东非和南非有广泛分布,并且显示出需要进一步研究的遗传亚结构。1866年的多线盾板蜥(Gerrhosaurus multilineatus Bocage)以及被称为黑纹盾板蜥的安哥拉种群的分类地位仍然存在问题。