Martinez-del-Campo Eduardo, Rangel-Castilla Leonardo, Soriano-Baron Hector, Theodore Nicholas
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1):E13. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.FOCUS1496.
Performance of MR imaging in patients with gunshot wounds at or near the lumbar spinal canal is controversial. The authors reviewed the literature on the use of MR imaging in gunshot wounds to the spine. They discuss the results from in vitro and clinical studies, analyze the physical properties of common projectiles, and evaluate the safety and indications for MR imaging when metallic fragments are located near the spinal canal.
A review of the English-language literature was performed. Data from 25 articles were analyzed, including 5 in vitro studies of the interaction between 95 projectiles and the MR system's magnetic fields, and the clinical outcomes in 22 patients with metallic fragments at or near the spinal canal who underwent MR imaging.
Properties of 95 civilian and military projectiles were analyzed at a magnet strength of 1, 1.5, 3, and 7 T. The most common projectiles were bullets with a core of lead, either with a copper jacket or unjacketed (73 [76.8%] of 95). Steel-containing (core or jacket) projectiles comprised 14.7%. No field interaction was evident in 78 (96.3%) of the 81 nonsteel projectiles. All steel projectiles showed at least positive deflection forces, longitudinal migration, or rotation. Heating of the projectiles was clinically insignificant. Image artifact was significant in all 9 steel bullets tested, but was not significant in 39 (88.6%) of the 44 nonsteel bullets tested. Overall, 22 patients with complete (82%) and incomplete (14%) spinal cord injury secondary to a projectile lodged inside the spinal canal underwent MR imaging. Discomfort and further physical or neurological deficits were not reported by any patient. Two patients with spinal cord injuries underwent MR imaging studies before surgical decompression and had subsequent, significant neurological improvement.
Metallic implants near or at the spinal canal are a relative contraindication for MR imaging. However, safe MR imaging might be feasible when a projectile's properties and a patient's individualized clinical presentation are considered.
磁共振成像(MR成像)在腰椎椎管或其附近枪伤患者中的应用存在争议。作者回顾了关于脊柱枪伤中使用MR成像的文献。他们讨论了体外和临床研究的结果,分析了常见射弹的物理特性,并评估了金属碎片位于椎管附近时MR成像的安全性和适应证。
对英文文献进行了回顾。分析了25篇文章的数据,包括5项关于95枚射弹与MR系统磁场相互作用的体外研究,以及22例椎管或其附近有金属碎片且接受MR成像的患者的临床结果。
在1、1.5、3和7T的磁场强度下分析了95枚民用和军用射弹的特性。最常见的射弹是铅芯子弹,有铜质弹壳或无弹壳(95枚中的73枚[76.8%])。含钢(芯或弹壳)射弹占14.7%。81枚非钢射弹中的78枚(96.3%)未显示明显的磁场相互作用。所有钢质射弹均显示至少有正向偏转力、纵向移动或旋转。射弹发热在临床上无显著意义。在所有测试的9枚钢质子弹中图像伪影明显,但在测试的44枚非钢质子弹中的39枚(88.6%)中不明显。总体而言,22例因椎管内有射弹继发完全性(82%)和不完全性(14%)脊髓损伤的患者接受了MR成像。没有患者报告不适或进一步的身体或神经功能缺损。2例脊髓损伤患者在手术减压前接受了MR成像检查,随后神经功能有显著改善。
椎管附近或椎管内的金属植入物是MR成像的相对禁忌证。然而,考虑射弹特性和患者个体化临床表现时,安全的MR成像可能是可行的。