Kim Sung-Jae, Lee Su-Keon, Kim Sung-Hwan, Jeong Jae-Hoon, Kim Hak-Soo, Lee Se-Won, Lee Jae-Hoo, Jung Min
Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gwangmyung Sungae Hospital, Gyeonggi, Korea.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):937-44. doi: 10.1177/0363546514544677. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
There have been no clinical studies regarding the effect of decreased meniscal thickness on outcomes after meniscectomy.
To examine the postoperative outcomes of partial meniscectomy with or without horizontal resection compared with the outcomes of subtotal meniscectomy and to evaluate the influence of decreased thickness of the medial meniscus on outcomes after partial meniscectomy.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A total of 312 patients who underwent medial meniscectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group A (n = 84) included patients with partial meniscectomy with vertical resection, group B (n = 140) consisted of those with partial meniscectomy with horizontal resection, and group C (n = 88) included those with subtotal meniscectomy. Clinical function was evaluated by use of the Lysholm knee scoring scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, and Tapper and Hoover grading system. Radiologic evaluation was performed with the IKDC radiographic assessment scale as well as with measurements of the medial compartment height at the tibiofemoral joint. Preoperative values and postoperative values measured 5 years after operation were assessed.
Functional outcomes in group C were inferior to those in groups A and B according to the Lysholm knee score (mean ± SD for group A = 96.1 ± 4.7, group B = 94.9 ± 5.2, group C = 84.8 ± 11.4; P < .001), IKDC subjective score (group A = 92.1 ± 6.5, group B = 91.3 ± 8.8, group C = 81 ± 11.4; P < .001), and Tapper and Hoover grading system (P = .003). There was no significant difference in scores between groups A and B. With regard to radiologic evaluation, the IKDC radiographic grade for group C was worse than the grades for groups A and B (P < .001); there was no significant difference between groups A and B. However, the postoperative joint space on the affected side was higher for group A (4.7 ± 0.6 mm) than for groups B (4.3 ± 0.5 mm; P < .001) and C (3.7 ± 0.8 mm; P < .001). The joint space was higher in group B than in group C (P < .001).
Despite joint space narrowing, decreases in meniscal thickness after partial meniscectomy for horizontal tear had no additional adverse effect on 5-year functional and radiographic outcomes compared with conventional partial meniscectomy preserving whole meniscal thickness. In treating horizontal tears of the meniscus, partial meniscectomy with complete resection of the unstable leaf was an effective method in a 5-year follow-up study.
尚无关于半月板厚度减小对半月板切除术后疗效影响的临床研究。
比较部分半月板切除术(水平切除或不水平切除)与次全半月板切除术的术后疗效,并评估内侧半月板厚度减小对部分半月板切除术后疗效的影响。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
对312例行内侧半月板切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为3组:A组(n = 84)为行垂直部分半月板切除术的患者,B组(n = 140)为行水平部分半月板切除术的患者,C组(n = 88)为行次全半月板切除术的患者。采用Lysholm膝关节评分量表、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观膝关节评估表以及Tapper和Hoover分级系统评估临床功能。采用IKDC影像学评估量表以及测量胫股关节内侧间隙高度进行影像学评估。评估术前值及术后5年测量的术后值。
根据Lysholm膝关节评分(A组均值±标准差=96.1±4.7,B组=94.9±5.2,C组=84.8±11.4;P <.001)、IKDC主观评分(A组=92.1±6.5,B组=91.3±8.8,C组=81±11.4;P <.001)以及Tapper和Hoover分级系统(P =.003),C组的功能结局劣于A组和B组。A组和B组之间的评分无显著差异。关于影像学评估,C组的IKDC影像学分级比A组和B组差(P <.001);A组和B组之间无显著差异。然而,A组患侧术后关节间隙(4.7±0.6 mm)高于B组(4.3±0.5 mm;P <.001)和C组(3.7±0.8 mm;P <.001)。B组的关节间隙高于C组(P <.001)。
尽管关节间隙变窄,但与保留整个半月板厚度的传统部分半月板切除术相比,水平撕裂的部分半月板切除术后半月板厚度减小对5年功能和影像学结局无额外不良影响。在半月板水平撕裂的治疗中,在一项为期5年的随访研究中,完全切除不稳定瓣的部分半月板切除术是一种有效的方法。