Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 1;114(7):955-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.069. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Compared with non-smokers, cigarette smokers with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions derive greater benefit from fibrinolytic therapy. However, it is not known whether the optimal treatment strategy after fibrinolysis differs on the basis of smoking status. The Trial of Routine Angioplasty and Stenting After Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI) randomized patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions to a routine early invasive (pharmacoinvasive) versus a standard (early transfer only for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention or delayed angiography) strategy after fibrinolysis. The efficacy of these strategies was compared in 1,051 patients on the basis of their smoking status. Treatment heterogeneity was assessed between smokers and non-smokers, and multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate for an interaction between smoking status and treatment strategy after adjusting for baseline Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score. Smokers (n=448) were younger, had fewer cardiovascular risk factors, and had lower GRACE risk scores. They had a lower rate of the primary composite end point of 30-day mortality, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, heart failure, or cardiogenic shock and fewer deaths or reinfarctions at 6 months and 1 year. Smoking status was not a significant predictor of either primary or secondary end points in multivariable analysis. Pharmacoinvasive management reduced the primary end point compared with standard therapy in smokers (7.7% vs 13.6%, p=0.04) and non-smokers (13.1% vs 19.7%, p=0.03). Smoking status did not modify treatment effect on any measured outcomes (p>0.10 for all). In conclusion, compared with non-smokers, current smokers receiving either standard or early invasive management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after fibrinolysis have more favorable outcomes, which is likely attributable to their better baseline risk profile. The beneficial treatment effect of a pharmacoinvasive strategy is consistent in smokers and non-smokers.
与不吸烟者相比,ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的吸烟者从纤溶治疗中获益更大。然而,尚不清楚纤溶治疗后最佳治疗策略是否因吸烟状况而异。溶栓后常规血管成形术和支架置入以改善急性心肌梗死再灌注(TRANSFER-AMI)试验将 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者随机分为常规早期介入(药物介入)与标准策略(仅早期转介行补救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或延迟血管造影)。根据吸烟状况,对 1051 例患者比较了这两种策略的疗效。评估了吸烟者和不吸烟者之间治疗的异质性,并进行多变量分析,以评价在调整基线全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)风险评分后,吸烟状况和治疗策略之间的相互作用。吸烟者(n=448)年龄较小,心血管危险因素较少,GRACE 风险评分较低。他们的 30 天死亡率、再梗死、复发性缺血、心力衰竭或心源性休克的主要复合终点发生率较低,6 个月和 1 年时的死亡率和再梗死发生率也较低。多变量分析中,吸烟状况不是主要或次要终点的显著预测因素。与标准治疗相比,药物介入治疗降低了吸烟者(7.7%比 13.6%,p=0.04)和不吸烟者(13.1%比 19.7%,p=0.03)的主要终点事件发生率。在所有测量的结局中,吸烟状况都没有改变治疗效果(p>0.10)。总之,与不吸烟者相比,溶栓后接受 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死标准或早期介入治疗的现吸烟者有更好的预后,这可能归因于他们更好的基线风险状况。药物介入策略的有益治疗效果在吸烟者和不吸烟者中是一致的。