Saif Muhammad Wasif, Ledbetter Leslie, Kaley Kristin, Garcon Marie Carmel, Rodriguez Teresa, Syrigos Kostas N
Section of GI Cancers and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Oncol Lett. 2014 Sep;8(3):1302-1306. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2238. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Therapeutic options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) include concurrent chemoradiation, induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or systemic therapy alone. The original Gastro-Intestinal Study Group and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studies defined fluorouracil (5-FU) with concurrent radiation therapy followed by maintenance 5-FU until progression, as the standard therapy for this subset of patients. Although this combined therapy has been demonstrated to increase local control and median survival from 8 to 12 months, almost all patients succumb to the disease secondary to either local or distant recurrence. Our earlier studies provided a strong rationale for the use of capecitabine in combination with concurrent radiation followed by maintenance capecitabine therapy. To report our clinical experience, we retrospectively evaluated our patients who were treated with maintenance capecitabine. We reviewed the medical records of patients with LAPC who received treatment with capecitabine and radiation, followed by a 4-week rest, then capecitabine alone 1,000 mg twice daily (ECOG performance status 2 or age >70 years) or 1,500 mg twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks until progressive disease. We treated 43 patients between September 2004 and September 2012. The population consisted of 16 females and 25 males, with a median age of 64 years (range, 38-80 years). Patients received maintenance capecitabine for median duration of 9 months (range, 3-18 months). The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 17 months, with two patients still living and receiving therapy. The 6-month survival rate was 91% (39/43), 1-year survival rate was 72% (31/43) and 2-year OS rate was 26% (11/43). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed rarely: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in two patients, diarrhea in one patient and peripheral neuropathy in one patient, and there was no mortality directly related to treatment. Capecitabine maintenance therapy following chemoradiation in LAPC offers an effective, tolerable and convenient alternative to 5-FU. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of its kind which has determined the safety and efficacy of capecitabine maintenance therapy for patients with LAPC.
局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的治疗选择包括同步放化疗、诱导化疗后再进行放化疗或单纯进行全身治疗。最初的胃肠道研究组和东部肿瘤协作组的研究将氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与同步放疗联合应用,随后持续使用5-FU直至疾病进展,定义为这类患者的标准治疗方案。尽管这种联合治疗已被证明可提高局部控制率,并使中位生存期从8个月延长至12个月,但几乎所有患者最终都因局部或远处复发而死于该疾病。我们早期的研究为使用卡培他滨联合同步放疗,随后进行卡培他滨维持治疗提供了有力的理论依据。为了报告我们的临床经验,我们对接受卡培他滨维持治疗的患者进行了回顾性评估。我们查阅了接受卡培他滨和放疗治疗的LAPC患者的病历,放疗后休息4周,然后对于东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为2或年龄>70岁的患者,单独给予卡培他滨1000 mg,每日两次;或每3周给予卡培他滨1500 mg,每日两次,共14天,直至疾病进展。在2004年9月至2012年9月期间,我们共治疗了43例患者。患者群体包括16名女性和25名男性,中位年龄为64岁(范围38 - 80岁)。患者接受卡培他滨维持治疗的中位持续时间为9个月(范围3 - 18个月)。这些患者的中位总生存期(OS)为17个月,有两名患者仍存活并接受治疗。6个月生存率为91%(39/43),1年生存率为72%(31/43),2年总生存率为26%(11/43)。很少观察到3级或4级毒性反应:两名患者出现手足综合征(HFS),一名患者出现腹泻,一名患者出现周围神经病变,且没有直接与治疗相关的死亡病例。LAPC患者在放化疗后进行卡培他滨维持治疗,为5-FU提供了一种有效、可耐受且方便的替代方案。据我们所知,这是同类研究中规模最大的一项,已确定了卡培他滨维持治疗对LAPC患者的安全性和有效性。