Suppr超能文献

作为医院护理质量衡量标准的隔离与约束:是否存在任何例外情况?

Seclusion and restraint as measures of the quality of hospital care: any exceptions?

作者信息

Sacks Michael H, Walton Michael F

机构信息

Dr. Sacks is with the Department of Psychiatry, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York City. Dr. Walton is with the Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York City. Send correspondence to Dr. Walton (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Nov 1;65(11):1373-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300577. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

Abstract

The Joint Commission has recently included seclusion and restraint as quality-of-care indicators for hospital-based inpatient psychiatric services. Their inclusion is the result of abuse of these practices, wide variation across hospitals, and cultural influences, including the consumer and recovery movements. Over the next few years, these indicators will increasingly influence treatment modalities available to hospitalized patients. This Open Forum provides a brief history of changing attitudes toward use of seclusion and restraint. It describes three clinical scenarios that highlight appropriate and humane use of seclusion and restraint and that illustrate the clinical complexities associated with their use. Potential unforeseen consequences of the reduction or elimination of seclusion and restraint are described.

摘要

联合委员会最近已将隔离和约束纳入医院住院精神科服务的护理质量指标。将其纳入是这些做法被滥用、各医院差异很大以及包括消费者和康复运动在内的文化影响的结果。在未来几年里,这些指标将越来越多地影响住院患者可获得的治疗方式。本公开论坛简要介绍了对使用隔离和约束态度的变化历程。它描述了三个临床案例,突出了隔离和约束的恰当且人道的使用,并说明了与使用它们相关的临床复杂性。还描述了减少或消除隔离和约束可能产生的意外后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验