Maisel Alan, Xue Yang, van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Voors Adriaan A, Jaarsma Tiny, Pang Peter S, Butler Javed, Pitt Bertram, Clopton Paul, de Boer Rudolf A
Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 1;114(5):737-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.062. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
The aim of our study is to investigate the effect of spironolactone on 30-day outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) and the association between treatment and outcomes stratified by biomarkers. We conducted a secondary analysis of the biomarker substudy of the multicenter COACH (Co-ordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure) trial involving 534 AHF patients for 30-day mortality and HF rehospitalizations. Spironolactone therapy was initiated and terminated at the discretion of the treating physician; 30-day outcomes were compared between patients who were treated with spironolactone and those who were not. Outcomes with spironolactone therapy were explored based on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ST2, galectin-3, and creatinine levels. Spironolactone was prescribed to 297 (55.6%) patients at discharge (158 new and 139 continued). There were 19 deaths and 30 HF rehospitalizations among 46 patients by 30 days. Patients discharged on spironolactone had significantly less 30-day event (hazard ratio 0.538, p = 0.039) after adjustment for multiple risk factors. Initiation of spironolactone in patients who were not on spironolactone before admission was associated with a significant reduction in event rate (hazard ratio 0.362, p = 0.027). The survival benefit of spironolactone was more prominent in patient groups with elevations of creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ST2, or galectin-3. In conclusion, AHF patients who received spironolactone during hospitalization had significantly fewer 30-day mortality and HF rehospitalizations, especially in high-risk patients.
我们研究的目的是调查螺内酯对急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者30天预后的影响,以及按生物标志物分层的治疗与预后之间的关联。我们对多中心COACH(心力衰竭咨询与辅导结果协调研究)试验的生物标志物子研究进行了二次分析,该试验纳入了534例AHF患者,以评估30天死亡率和心力衰竭再住院情况。螺内酯治疗由主治医生自行决定开始和终止;比较接受螺内酯治疗的患者和未接受螺内酯治疗的患者的30天预后。基于N末端B型利钠肽原、ST2、半乳糖凝集素-3和肌酐水平探索螺内酯治疗的预后情况。出院时297例(55.6%)患者接受了螺内酯治疗(158例新开始用药,139例继续用药)。到30天时,46例患者中有19例死亡,30例心力衰竭再住院。在调整多个风险因素后,出院时接受螺内酯治疗的患者30天事件显著减少(风险比0.538,p = 0.039)。入院前未使用螺内酯的患者开始使用螺内酯与事件发生率显著降低相关(风险比0.362,p = 0.027)。在肌酐、N末端B型利钠肽原、ST2或半乳糖凝集素-3升高的患者组中,螺内酯的生存获益更为显著。总之,住院期间接受螺内酯治疗的AHF患者30天死亡率和心力衰竭再住院显著减少,尤其是高危患者。