Protz Kerstin, Heyer Kristina, Dörler Martin, Stücker Markus, Hampel-Kalthoff Carsten, Augustin Matthias
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen, CWC - Comprehensive Wound Center, Hamburg.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Sep;12(9):794-801. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12405. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
Compression bandaging is the most prevalent form of treatment for venous leg ulcers. Successful treatment requires knowledge of the appropriate materials and the ability to employ them following current guidelines. This study investigates German health-care providers for their knowledge of bandage materials and their practical ability in applying short-stretch compression bandages.
Within the framework of nationwide practical education on compression therapy, the participants' knowledge was quantified by asking standardized questions. Furthermore, their practical ability was evaluated by having them apply compression bandages within a pressure range of 50-60 mmHg. Another criterion was the pressure drop after a four-time dorsiflexion.
Overall, 891 providers (3.3 % physicians, 5.5 % medical assistants, 90.7 % nursing staff) participated. Within the practical test only few (just under 10%) applied the bandages with the intended pressure; 77.0 % applied them below and 13.7 % above the target pressure. After a four-time dorsiflexion there was an average pressure drop of 6.7 mmHg. Surveying the participant's skills revealed that only 11.9 % knew about padding beneath compression bandages, 15.0 % knew of multi-component systems, and 14.8 % were familiar with ulcer stocking systems.
Clearly, compression material and its application are unfamiliar to most practice employees. Without question there are deficits in the provision of compression therapy.
加压包扎是治疗下肢静脉溃疡最常用的方法。成功的治疗需要了解合适的材料,并具备按照现行指南使用这些材料的能力。本研究调查了德国医疗保健人员对绷带材料的了解情况以及他们应用短拉伸加压绷带的实际能力。
在全国范围内的加压治疗实践教育框架内,通过询问标准化问题对参与者的知识进行量化。此外,通过让他们在50 - 60 mmHg的压力范围内应用加压绷带,评估他们的实际能力。另一个标准是四次背屈后的压力下降情况。
总体而言,891名医疗保健人员参与了研究(3.3%为医生,5.5%为医疗助理,90.7%为护理人员)。在实际测试中,只有少数人(略低于10%)以预期压力应用绷带;77.0%的人应用的压力低于目标压力,13.7%的人应用的压力高于目标压力。四次背屈后,平均压力下降6.7 mmHg。对参与者技能的调查显示,只有11.9%的人知道加压绷带下方的衬垫,15.0%的人了解多组件系统,14.8%的人熟悉溃疡袜系统。
显然,大多数实际从业者对加压材料及其应用并不熟悉。毫无疑问,在加压治疗的提供方面存在不足。