Suppr超能文献

结节病患者的恶性肿瘤发病率会增加吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Is the incidence of malignancy increased in patients with sarcoidosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ungprasert Patompong, Srivali Narat, Wijarnpreecha Karn, Thongprayoon Charat, Cheungpasitporn Wisit, Knight Eric L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Respirology. 2014 Oct;19(7):993-8. doi: 10.1111/resp.12369. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

Abstract

A possible causal relationship between sarcoidosis and malignancy has been the subject of debates for decades. To better understand this association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies that reported relative risk, hazard ratio or standardized incidence ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) comparing the incidence of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis versus non-sarcoidosis participants. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance methodology. Five studies were identified and included in our data analyses. The pooled RR of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04-1.40). However, when we performed a sensitivity analysis that included only studies that compared the incidence of malignancy after the first year of the diagnosis of sarcoidosis with the incidence of malignancy after the first year of index date for non-sarcoidosis controls, the pooled risk ratio decreased and did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.97-1.32). Furthermore, analysis for publication bias has suggested that publication bias in favour of positive studies may be present. In conclusion, after accounting for possible detection bias and publication bias, there does not appear be a significant association between sarcoidosis and malignancy.

摘要

几十年来,结节病与恶性肿瘤之间可能存在的因果关系一直是争论的焦点。为了更好地理解这种关联,我们对队列研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些研究报告了相对风险、风险比或标准化发病率,并带有95%置信区间(CI),用于比较结节病患者与非结节病参与者的恶性肿瘤发病率。使用随机效应、通用逆方差方法计算合并风险比(RR)和95% CI。共识别出五项研究并纳入我们的数据分析。结节病患者发生恶性肿瘤的合并RR为1.21(95% CI:1.04 - 1.40)。然而,当我们进行敏感性分析时,仅纳入了那些将结节病诊断后第一年的恶性肿瘤发病率与非结节病对照的索引日期后第一年的恶性肿瘤发病率进行比较的研究,合并风险比降低且未达到统计学显著性(RR 1.13,95% CI:0.97 - 1.32)。此外,发表偏倚分析表明可能存在有利于阳性研究的发表偏倚。总之,在考虑了可能的检测偏倚和发表偏倚后,结节病与恶性肿瘤之间似乎没有显著关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验