Mercier Rebecca J, Liberty Abigail
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
To determine if intrauterine administration of 5 cc of 2% lidocaine in addition to paracervical block reduces pain during laminaria insertion, when compared with paracervical block and saline placebo.
This was a randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial. Women presenting for abortion by dilation and evacuation (D&E) at 14-24 weeks gestational age were randomized to receive an intrauterine instillation of either 5 mL of 2% lidocaine or 5 mL of normal saline, in addition to standard paracervical block with 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine. Our primary outcome was self-reported pain scores on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately following laminaria insertion. Secondary outcome was self-reported VAS pain score indicating the maximum level of pain experienced during the 24-48-h interval between laminaria insertion and D&E procedure.
Seventy-two women were enrolled, and data for 67 women were analyzed, only two of whom were more than 21 weeks on gestation. The range of pain scores at both time points was large (1-90 mm at laminaria insertion; 0-100mm in laminaria-D&E interval). Mean pain scores were not different between treatment groups at laminaria insertion, (33 vs. 32, p=.8) or in the laminaria - D&E interval (43 vs. 44, p=.9).
Intrauterine administration of 5 cc of 2% lidocaine in addition to paracervical block did not reduce pain with laminaria insertion when compared to paracervical block with saline placebo.
Intrauterine lidocaine combined with paracervical block does not improve pain control at laminaria insertion when compared with paracervical block and saline placebo. Wide variation in pain scores and persistent pain after laminaria insertion suggests patient would benefit from more effective methods of pain control at laminaria insertion and during the post-laminaria interval.
与宫颈旁阻滞和生理盐水安慰剂相比,确定在宫颈旁阻滞基础上宫腔内注射5毫升2%利多卡因是否能减轻海藻棒插入时的疼痛。
这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。孕14 - 24周行扩张刮宫术(D&E)流产的女性被随机分为两组,除接受20毫升0.25%布比卡因标准宫颈旁阻滞外,一组宫腔内注入5毫升2%利多卡因,另一组注入5毫升生理盐水。我们的主要结局指标是海藻棒插入后立即用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行的自我报告疼痛评分。次要结局指标是自我报告的VAS疼痛评分,表明在海藻棒插入与D&E手术之间的24 - 48小时内经历的最大疼痛程度。
共纳入72名女性,分析了67名女性的数据,其中只有两名妊娠超过21周。两个时间点的疼痛评分范围都很大(海藻棒插入时为1 - 90毫米;海藻棒插入至D&E手术期间为0 - 100毫米)。治疗组在海藻棒插入时的平均疼痛评分无差异(33对32,p = 0.8),在海藻棒插入至D&E手术期间也无差异(43对44,p = 0.9)。
与宫颈旁阻滞加生理盐水安慰剂相比,宫颈旁阻滞基础上宫腔内注射5毫升2%利多卡因并不能减轻海藻棒插入时的疼痛。
与宫颈旁阻滞和生理盐水安慰剂相比,宫腔内利多卡因联合宫颈旁阻滞在海藻棒插入时并不能改善疼痛控制。海藻棒插入后疼痛评分差异大且持续疼痛,表明患者将受益于更有效的海藻棒插入时及插入后疼痛控制方法。