Morgaz Juan, Granados María Del Mar, Muñoz-Rascón Pilar, Dominguez Juan Manuel, Fernández-Sarmiento Jose Andrés, Gómez-Villamandos Rafael J, Navarrete Rocío
Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):562-70. doi: 10.1111/vec.12219. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
To (1) evaluate lithium dilution (LiDCO) and transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCOTD ) in relation to traditional thermodilution (PAC-TD) for determining cardiac output (CO) in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs and to (2) compare the continuous CO values obtained using power analysis (PulseCO) with continuous PiCCO (PiCCOc).
Prospective randomized study.
University research laboratory.
Fourteen healthy Beagles.
CO was measured using PAC-TD, LiDCO, and PiCCOTD in 3 different hemodynamic states induced in random order and defined on the basis of the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Normodynamic state was defined as the baseline MAP and 1 MAC sevoflurane. The hypodynamic state was induced with a deep level of sevoflurane anesthesia. The hyperdynamic state was induced with noradrenaline. After these measurements were obtained in each hemodynamic state, CO was monitored continuously for 30 min using PulseCO and PiCCOc. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients, and a trend score was determined for the continuous CO measurements.
There was good agreement among the 3 modalities of CO measurement in each hemodynamic state. The mean CIPAC-TD /CIPICCOTD bias was -0.04 ± 1.19 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -2.37/1.93 L/min/m(2) ), and the mean CIPAC-TD /CILiDCO bias was -0.11 ± 1.55 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -3.04/2.93 L/min/m(2) ). The mean CIPulseCO -CIPiCCOc bias was -0.04 ± 1.91 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -1.95/1.87 L/min/m(2) ), which suggested good agreement. The CIPulseCO -CIPiCCOc trend score, calculated from 252 paired comparisons, was 93.3% positive after zone exclusion (∆CI < 15%).
Both LiDCO and PiCCOTD agreed well with PAC-TD for the measurement of CO under different hemodynamic conditions. Moreover, PiCCOc appears to be an accurate method for monitoring continuous CO in dogs as its performance for measurement was similar to that of PulseCO.
(1)评估锂稀释法(LiDCO)和经肺热稀释法(PiCCOTD)与传统热稀释法(PAC - TD)在测定犬三种不同血流动力学状态下心输出量(CO)方面的差异;(2)比较使用功率分析(PulseCO)获得的连续CO值与连续PiCCO(PiCCOc)值。
前瞻性随机研究。
大学研究实验室。
14只健康的比格犬。
使用PAC - TD、LiDCO和PiCCOTD在随机顺序诱导的三种不同血流动力学状态下测量CO,这些状态根据平均动脉压(MAP)定义。正常血流动力学状态定义为基线MAP和1 MAC七氟醚。低动力状态通过深度七氟醚麻醉诱导。高动力状态通过去甲肾上腺素诱导。在每种血流动力学状态下获得这些测量值后,使用PulseCO和PiCCOc连续监测CO 30分钟。使用Bland - Altman分析和组内相关系数评估一致性,并为连续CO测量确定趋势评分。
在每种血流动力学状态下,三种CO测量方式之间具有良好的一致性。平均CIPAC - TD/CIPICCOTD偏差为 - 0.04 ± 1.19 L/min/m²(一致性界限,-2.37/1.93 L/min/m²),平均CIPAC - TD/CILiDCO偏差为 - 0.11 ± 1.55 L/min/m²(一致性界限,-3.04/2.93 L/min/m²)。平均CIPulseCO - CIPiCCOc偏差为 - 0.04 ± 1.91 L/min/m²(一致性界限,-1.9 /1.87 L/min/m²),这表明一致性良好。从252对配对比较计算得出的CIPulseCO - CIPiCCOc趋势评分在排除区域(∆CI < 15%)后为93.3%阳性。
在不同血流动力学条件下测量CO时,LiDCO和PiCCOTD与PAC - TD的一致性都很好。此外,PiCCOc似乎是监测犬连续CO的准确方法,因为其测量性能与PulseCO相似。