Réanimation Polyvalente, CHR Hotel Dieu, Narbonne, France.
Réanimation Polyvalente et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France; Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):1586-1593. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0681.
It has been suggested that the complementary use of echocardiography could improve the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography (LUS) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Nevertheless, the additional diagnostic value of echocardiographic data when coupled with LUS is still debated in this setting. The aim of the current study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of LUS and an integrative cardiopulmonary ultrasound approach (thoracic ultrasonography [TUS]) in patients with ARF.
We prospectively recruited patients consecutively admitted for ARF to the ICU of a university teaching hospital over a 12-month period. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and the presence of criteria for severe ARF justifying ICU admission. We compared both LUS and TUS approaches and the final diagnosis determined by a panel of experts using machine learning methods to improve the accuracy of the final diagnostic classifiers.
One hundred thirty-six patients were included (age, 68 ± 15 years; sex ratio, 1). A three-dimensional partial least squares and multinomial logistic regression model was developed and subsequently tested in an independent sample of patients. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of TUS was significantly greater than LUS (P < .05, learning and test sample). Comparisons between receiver operating characteristic curves showed that TUS significantly improves the diagnosis of cardiogenic edema (P < .001, learning and test samples), pneumonia (P < .001, learning and test samples), and pulmonary embolism (P < .001, learning sample).
This study demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge a significantly better performance of TUS than LUS in the diagnosis of ARF. The value of the TUS approach was particularly important to disambiguate cases of hemodynamic pulmonary edema and pneumonia. We suggest that the bedside use of artificial intelligence methods in this setting could pave the way for the development of new clinically relevant integrative diagnostic models.
有人提出,超声心动图的补充使用可以提高急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者肺部超声(LUS)的诊断准确性。然而,在这种情况下,超声心动图数据与 LUS 相结合的附加诊断价值仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较 LUS 和综合心肺超声方法(胸部超声 [TUS])在 ARF 患者中的诊断准确性。
我们前瞻性地连续招募了在 12 个月期间因 ARF 入住大学教学医院 ICU 的患者。纳入标准为年龄≥18 岁和存在需要 ICU 入住的严重 ARF 标准。我们比较了 LUS 和 TUS 两种方法,并使用机器学习方法对由专家组确定的最终诊断进行比较,以提高最终诊断分类器的准确性。
共纳入 136 例患者(年龄 68±15 岁;性别比 1)。开发了一个三维偏最小二乘和多项逻辑回归模型,并随后在患者的独立样本中进行了测试。总体而言,TUS 的诊断准确性明显大于 LUS(P<.05,学习和测试样本)。接收器操作特征曲线的比较表明,TUS 显著改善了心源性水肿(P<.001,学习和测试样本)、肺炎(P<.001,学习和测试样本)和肺栓塞(P<.001,学习样本)的诊断。
本研究首次证明,在 ARF 的诊断中,TUS 的性能明显优于 LUS。TUS 方法的价值对于区分血流动力学性肺水肿和肺炎的病例尤为重要。我们建议,在这种情况下,床边使用人工智能方法可能为开发新的临床相关综合诊断模型铺平道路。