Theis Nina, Barber Nicholas A, Gillespie Sandra D, Hazzard Ruth V, Adler Lynn S
Division of Natural Sciences, Mathematics, and Technology, Elms College, Chicopee, Massachusetts 01013 USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115 USA.
Am J Bot. 2014 Aug;101(8):1314-22. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400171. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
•
Floral traits play important roles in pollinator attraction and defense against floral herbivory. However, plants may experience trade-offs between conspicuousness to pollinators and herbivore attraction. Comparative studies provide an excellent framework to examine the role of multiple traits shaping mutualist and antagonist interactions.•
To assess whether putative defensive and attractive traits predict species interactions, we grew 20 different Cucurbitaceae species and varieties in the field to measure interactions with pollinators and herbivores and in the greenhouse to assess trait variation. Cucurbits are characterized by the production of cucurbitacins, bitter nonvolatile terpenoids that are effective against generalist herbivores but can attract specialist beetles. We determined whether plant traits such as cucurbitacins predict herbivore resistance and pollinator attraction using an information-theoretic approach.•
Mutualists and floral antagonists were attracted to the same cucurbit varieties once they flowered. However, rather than cucurbitacin concentration, we found that the size of the flower and volatile emissions of floral sesquiterpenoids explained both pollinator and floral herbivore visitation preference across cucurbit taxa. This pattern held across cucurbit taxa and within the Cucurbita genus.•
Surprisingly, floral sesquiterpenoid volatiles, which are associated with direct defense, indirect defense, and attraction, rather than defense traits such as cucurbitacins, appeared to drive interactions with both pollinators and floral herbivores across cucurbit taxa. Identifying the relevant plant traits for attraction and deterrence is important in this economically valuable crop, particularly if pollinators and floral herbivores use the same plant traits as cues.
• 研究前提:花部性状在吸引传粉者以及抵御花部食草动物方面发挥着重要作用。然而,植物在对传粉者的显眼程度和对食草动物的吸引力之间可能会面临权衡。比较研究为检验多种性状在塑造互利共生和拮抗相互作用中的作用提供了一个绝佳的框架。
• 方法:为了评估假定的防御性和吸引性性状是否能预测物种间的相互作用,我们在田间种植了20种不同的葫芦科物种和品种,以测量与传粉者和食草动物的相互作用,并在温室中评估性状变异。葫芦科植物的特征是产生葫芦素,这是一种苦味的非挥发性萜类化合物,对广食性食草动物有效,但能吸引专食性甲虫。我们使用信息论方法确定葫芦素等植物性状是否能预测对食草动物的抗性和对传粉者的吸引力。
• 主要结果:一旦葫芦科植物开花,互利共生者和花部拮抗者都会被相同的葫芦品种所吸引。然而,我们发现,不是葫芦素浓度,而是花的大小和花部倍半萜类化合物的挥发性排放解释了整个葫芦科类群中传粉者和花部食草动物的访花偏好。这种模式在整个葫芦科类群以及南瓜属内都成立。
• 结论:令人惊讶的是,与直接防御、间接防御和吸引相关的花部倍半萜类化合物挥发性物质,而不是像葫芦素这样的防御性状,似乎驱动了整个葫芦科类群与传粉者和花部食草动物的相互作用。在这种具有经济价值的作物中,确定吸引和威慑的相关植物性状很重要,特别是如果传粉者和花部食草动物都将相同的植物性状用作线索的话。