Suppr超能文献

与听力障碍主观评估准确性相关的因素。

Factors associated with the accuracy of subjective assessments of hearing impairment.

作者信息

Kamil Rebecca J, Genther Dane J, Lin Frank R

机构信息

1Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA; 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; and 3Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Geriatric Medicine, Mental Health, and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):164-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000075.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Self-reported hearing impairment is often used to gauge objective hearing loss in both clinical settings and research studies. The aim of this study was to examine whether demographic factors affect the accuracy of subjective, self-reported hearing in older adults.

DESIGN

We examined 3557 participants aged 50 and older in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles 1999-2006 and 2009-2010. We examined the relationship between objective and subjective hearing impairment using percent correct classification and misclassification bias in analyses stratified by gender, age group, race/ethnicity, and education.

RESULTS

We found that younger participants tended to overestimate and older participants underestimate their hearing impairment. Older women, blacks, and Hispanics were less accurate in self-reporting than their respective younger age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between subjective and objective hearing differs across gender, age, race/ethnicity, and education, and this observation should be considered by clinicians and researchers employing self-reported hearing.

摘要

目的

在临床环境和研究中,自我报告的听力障碍常被用于评估客观听力损失。本研究的目的是检验人口统计学因素是否会影响老年人主观自我报告听力的准确性。

设计

我们在1999 - 2006年和2009 - 2010年的国家健康和营养检查调查中,对3557名50岁及以上的参与者进行了研究。在按性别、年龄组、种族/族裔和教育程度分层的分析中,我们使用正确分类百分比和错误分类偏差来研究客观和主观听力障碍之间的关系。

结果

我们发现年轻参与者倾向于高估,而老年参与者倾向于低估他们的听力障碍。老年女性、黑人及西班牙裔在自我报告方面不如各自较年轻年龄组准确。

结论

主观和客观听力之间的关联因性别、年龄、种族/族裔和教育程度而异,临床医生和使用自我报告听力的研究人员应考虑这一观察结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Midlife hearing loss and dementia risk.中年听力损失与痴呆风险。
Nat Aging. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1038/s43587-025-00955-6.

本文引用的文献

2
Hearing loss in older adults: who's listening?老年人听力损失:谁在倾听?
JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1147-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.321.
4
Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States.美国老年人听力损失的患病率及相关风险因素。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 May;66(5):582-90. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr002. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
5
Hearing loss and incident dementia.听力损失与新发痴呆症。
Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):214-20. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.362.
6
Auditory screening in the elderly: comparison between self-report and audiometry.老年人的听力筛查:自我报告与听力测定的比较
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Mar-Apr;71(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31310-0. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
8
Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss.自我报告的听力损失的准确性。
Audiology. 1998 Sep-Oct;37(5):295-301. doi: 10.3109/00206099809072983.
9
The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool.老年人听力障碍量表:一种新工具。
Ear Hear. 1982 May-Jun;3(3):128-34. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198205000-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验