Suppr超能文献

无知还是偏见?评估气候变化沟通差距的意识形态和信息驱动因素。

Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change.

作者信息

Nisbet Erik C, Cooper Kathryn E, Ellithorpe Morgan

机构信息

The Ohio State University, USA

The Ohio State University, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2015 Apr;24(3):285-301. doi: 10.1177/0963662514545909. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

Abstract

Does the relationship between media use and learning about climate change depend more on audiences' scientific literacy on their ideological biases? To answer this question, we evaluate both the knowledge gap and belief gap hypotheses as they relate to climate change. Results indicate belief gaps for news and entertainment content and a knowledge gap for edutainment content. Climate change knowledge among conservatives decreased with greater attention to political news, but increased with greater attention to science news. TV entertainment was associated with a significant decrease in knowledge about climate change among liberals to similar levels as conservatives. Edutainment was associated with a widening gap in knowledge based on respondents' scientific literacy. Implications for informal learning about controversial science through the media are discussed.

摘要

媒体使用与了解气候变化之间的关系是否更多地取决于受众的科学素养而非其意识形态偏见?为了回答这个问题,我们评估了与气候变化相关的知识差距和信念差距假说。结果表明,新闻和娱乐内容存在信念差距,而寓教于乐内容存在知识差距。保守派中,对政治新闻关注度越高,气候变化知识越少,但对科学新闻关注度越高,气候变化知识越多。电视娱乐导致自由派中有关气候变化的知识显著减少,与保守派的水平相近。寓教于乐内容与基于受访者科学素养的知识差距扩大有关。文中讨论了通过媒体进行有争议科学的非正式学习的相关影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验