Department of Philosophy, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR 97219.
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Aug;37(4):435-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13003269.
I examine whether Wilson et al.'s argument for a science of positive intentional change constitutes an argument for a science of objective moral values. Drawing from their discussion, I present four reasons for thinking that it may be and some considerations on why it may not be. Concluding, I seek help from the authors.
我探讨了威尔逊等人关于积极的意向性变化之科学的观点是否构成了客观道德价值之科学的论据。从他们的讨论中,我提出了四点认为可能的理由,以及四点认为可能不成立的理由。最后,我向作者寻求帮助。