Ng Zhaowen Dennis, Krishna Lingaraj
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University of Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Aug;22(2):186-9. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200214.
To compare cemented versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in terms of operating time, blood loss, pain, functional outcome, morbidity, and mortality.
Medical records of 207 patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture using a cemented (n=96) or cementless (n=111) prosthesis were reviewed. Postoperative thigh pain, ambulatory status, and complications were assessed.
The cemented group had significantly longer operating time (p=0.017) and greater intraoperative blood loss (p=0.024). Postoperative thigh pain was significantly higher in the cementless group (p=0.023).
Cementless hemiarthroplasty is preferred over cemented hemiarthroplasty because of reduced operating time and intra-operative blood loss. It was associated with increased postoperative thigh pain, but functional outcomes, complications, and mortality were similar between the 2 groups.
比较骨水泥型与非骨水泥型双极半髋关节置换术在手术时间、失血量、疼痛、功能结局、发病率和死亡率方面的差异。
回顾了207例年龄≥60岁、因移位型股骨颈骨折接受骨水泥型(n = 96)或非骨水泥型(n = 111)假体双极半髋关节置换术患者的病历。评估术后大腿疼痛、行走状态和并发症。
骨水泥型组手术时间明显更长(p = 0.017),术中失血量更大(p = 0.024)。非骨水泥型组术后大腿疼痛明显更高(p = 0.023)。
由于手术时间缩短和术中失血量减少,非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术优于骨水泥型半髋关节置换术。它与术后大腿疼痛增加有关,但两组之间的功能结局、并发症和死亡率相似。