Suppr超能文献

巴基斯坦拉合尔市公立医院用药错误的发生情况以及手工处方系统与计算机化处方系统的比较。

Occurrence of medication errors and comparison of manual and computerized prescription systems in public sector hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan.

作者信息

Riaz Muhammad Kashif, Hashmi Furqan Khurshid, Bukhari Nadeem Irfan, Riaz Mohammad, Hussain Khalid

机构信息

University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 28;9(8):e106080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106080. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

The knowledge of medication errors is an essential prerequisite for better healthcare delivery. The present study investigated prescribing errors in prescriptions from outpatient departments (OPDs) and emergency wards of two public sector hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. A manual prescription system was followed in Hospital A. Hospital B was running a semi-computerised prescription system in the OPD and a fully computerised prescription system in the emergency ward. A total of 510 prescriptions from both departments of these two hospitals were evaluated for patient characteristics, demographics and medication errors. The data was analysed using a chi square test for comparison of errors between both the hospitals. The medical departments in OPDs of both hospitals were the highest prescribers at 45%-60%. The age group receiving the most treatment in emergency wards of both the hospitals was 21-30 years (21%-24%). A trend of omitting patient addresses and diagnoses was observed in almost all prescriptions from both of the hospitals. Nevertheless, patient information such as name, age, gender and legibility of the prescriber's signature were found in almost 100% of the electronic-prescriptions. In addition, no prescribing error was found pertaining to drug concentrations, quantity and rate of administration in e-prescriptions. The total prescribing errors in the OPD and emergency ward of Hospital A were found to be 44% and 60%, respectively. In hospital B, the OPD had 39% medication errors and the emergency department had 73.5% errors; this unexpected difference between the emergency ward and OPD of hospital B was mainly due to the inclusion of 69.4% omissions of route of administration in the prescriptions. The incidence of prescription overdose was approximately 7%-19% in the manual system and approximately 8% in semi and fully electronic system. The omission of information and incomplete information are contributors of prescribing errors in both manual and electronic prescriptions.

摘要

了解用药错误是提供更好医疗服务的重要前提。本研究调查了巴基斯坦拉合尔两家公立医院门诊部(OPD)和急诊病房处方中的开方错误。医院A采用人工处方系统。医院B在门诊部运行半计算机化处方系统,在急诊病房运行全计算机化处方系统。对这两家医院两个科室的共510张处方进行了患者特征、人口统计学和用药错误评估。使用卡方检验分析数据,以比较两家医院之间的错误情况。两家医院门诊部的医疗科室开方量最高,为45%-60%。两家医院急诊病房接受治疗最多的年龄组为21-30岁(21%-24%)。在两家医院几乎所有的处方中都观察到遗漏患者地址和诊断的趋势。然而,在几乎100%的电子处方中都能找到患者姓名、年龄、性别和开方者签名的清晰度等信息。此外,在电子处方中未发现与药物浓度、剂量和给药速度有关的开方错误。发现医院A门诊部和急诊病房的总开方错误率分别为44%和60%。在医院B,门诊部的用药错误率为39%,急诊科为73.5%;医院B急诊病房和门诊部之间的这种意外差异主要是由于处方中69.4%的给药途径遗漏。在人工系统中处方过量的发生率约为7%-19%,在半电子和全电子系统中约为8%。信息遗漏和信息不完整是人工处方和电子处方中开方错误的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f95/4148351/2b719c9ed939/pone.0106080.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验