Dinglas Victor D, Parker Ann M, Reddy Dereddi Raja S, Colantuoni Elizabeth, Zanni Jennifer M, Turnbull Alison E, Nelliot Archana, Ciesla Nancy, Needham Dale M
1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Oct;11(8):1230-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-231OC.
Rehabilitation started early during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay is associated with improved outcomes and is the basis for many quality improvement (QI) projects showing important changes in practice. However, little evidence exists regarding whether such changes are sustainable in real-world practice.
To evaluate the sustained effect of a quality improvement project on the timing of initiation of active physical therapy intervention in patients with acute lung injury (ALI).
This was a pre-post evaluation using prospectively collected data involving consecutive patients with ALI admitted pre-quality improvement (October 2004-April 2007, n = 120) versus post-quality improvement (July 2009-July 2012, n = 123) from a single medical ICU.
The primary outcome was time to first active physical therapy intervention, defined as strengthening, mobility, or cycle ergometry exercises. Among ICU survivors, more patients in the post-quality improvement versus pre-quality improvement group received physical therapy in the ICU (89% vs. 24%, P < 0.001) and were able to stand, transfer, or ambulate during physical therapy in the ICU (64% vs. 7%, P < 0.001). Among all patients in the post-quality improvement versus pre-quality improvement group, there was a shorter median (interquartile range) time to first physical therapy (4 [2, 6] vs. 11 d [6, 29], P < 0.001) and a greater median (interquartile range) proportion of ICU days with physical therapy after initiation (50% [33, 67%] vs. 18% [4, 47%], P = 0.003). In multivariable regression analysis, the post-quality improvement period was associated with shorter time to physical therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 8.38 [4.98, 14.11], P < 0.001), with this association significant for each of the 5 years during the post-quality improvement period. The following variables were independently associated with a longer time to physical therapy: higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.93 [0.89, 0.97]), higher FiO2 (0.86 [0.75, 0.99] for each 10% increase), use of an opioid infusion (0.47 [0.25, 0.89]), and deep sedation (0.24 [0.12, 0.46]).
In this single-site, pre-post analysis of patients with ALI, an early rehabilitation quality improvement project was independently associated with a substantial decrease in the time to initiation of active physical therapy intervention that was sustained over 5 years. Over the entire pre-post period, severity of illness and sedation were independently associated with a longer time to initiation of active physical therapy intervention in the ICU.
在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间尽早开始康复治疗与改善预后相关,并且是许多质量改进(QI)项目的基础,这些项目显示出实践中的重要变化。然而,关于这些变化在实际临床实践中是否可持续的证据很少。
评估一项质量改进项目对急性肺损伤(ALI)患者开始积极物理治疗干预时机的持续影响。
这是一项前后对照评估,使用前瞻性收集的数据,涉及来自单个医疗ICU的连续ALI患者,其中质量改进前(2004年10月至2007年4月,n = 120)与质量改进后(2009年7月至2012年7月,n = 123)。
主要结局是首次积极物理治疗干预的时间,定义为强化训练、活动能力训练或蹬车测力计运动。在ICU幸存者中,质量改进后组与质量改进前组相比,更多患者在ICU接受了物理治疗(89%对24%,P < 0.001),并且在ICU进行物理治疗期间能够站立、转移或行走(64%对7%,P < 0.001)。在质量改进后组与质量改进前组的所有患者中,首次物理治疗的中位(四分位间距)时间更短(4 [2, 6]天对11天 [6, 29],P < 0.001),开始后接受物理治疗的ICU天数的中位(四分位间距)比例更高(50% [33, 67%]对18% [4, 47%],P = 0.003)。在多变量回归分析中,质量改进后期与物理治疗时间缩短相关(调整后的风险比 [95%置信区间],8.38 [4.98, 14.11],P < 0.001),在质量改进后的5年中每年这种关联均显著。以下变量与物理治疗时间延长独立相关:较高的序贯器官衰竭评估评分(0.93 [0.89, 0.97])、较高的吸氧浓度(每增加10%为0.86 [0.75, 0.99])、使用阿片类药物输注(0.47 [0.25, 0.89])和深度镇静(0.24 [0.12, 0.46])。
在这项针对ALI患者的单中心前后对照分析中,一项早期康复质量改进项目与积极物理治疗干预开始时间的大幅缩短独立相关,且这种缩短持续了5年。在整个前后对照期间,疾病严重程度和镇静状态与ICU中开始积极物理治疗干预的时间延长独立相关。