Brauckhoff Michael, Naterstad Helle, Brauckhoff Katrin, Biermann Martin, Aas Turid
Department of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Surg. 2014 Aug 28;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-61.
It has recently been reported that a signal latency shorter than 3.5 ms after electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve signify a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. We present a patient with an ascending nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve. In this patient, the stimulation latency was longer than 3.5 ms.
A 74-years old female underwent redo surgery due to a right-sided recurrent nodular goitre. The signal latency on electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve at the level of the carotid artery bifurcation was 3.75 ms. Further dissection revealed a nonrecurrent but ascending course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. Caused by the recurrent goitre, the nerve was elongated to about 10 cm resulting in this long latency.
This case demonstrates that the formerly proposed "3.5 ms rule" for identifying a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve has exceptions. A longer latency does not necessarily exclude a nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve.
最近有报道称,电刺激迷走神经后信号潜伏期短于3.5毫秒表明喉返神经走行不恒定。我们报告一例喉返神经走行上升且不恒定的病例。在该患者中,刺激潜伏期长于3.5毫秒。
一名74岁女性因右侧复发性结节性甲状腺肿接受再次手术。在颈动脉分叉水平电刺激迷走神经时,信号潜伏期为3.75毫秒。进一步解剖发现喉返神经走行不恒定但呈上升趋势。由于复发性甲状腺肿,神经被拉长至约10厘米,导致潜伏期延长。
该病例表明,先前提出的用于识别喉返神经走行不恒定的“3.5毫秒规则”存在例外情况。较长的潜伏期不一定排除喉返神经走行不恒定。