Pflieger M, Bertram D
CS 90632, délégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, hôpital Pierre-Zobda-Quitman, centre hospitalier universitaire de Martinique, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique.
Direction de la recherche clinique et de l'innovation, siège administratif, hospices civils de Lyon, BP 2251, 3, quai des Célestins, 69229 Lyon cedex 02, France.
Arch Pediatr. 2014 Oct;21(10):1129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
To address the lack of appropriate pediatric drugs available on the global market, in 2000 the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) issued the ICH E11 guideline regarding the Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population. This guideline considerably changes the environment of drug development for children. It has been written specifically to harmonize, promote, and facilitate high-quality and ethical clinical research for children within the ICH regions, i.e., the United States of America (USA), the European Union (EU), and Japan. This article details the various regulations applicable in each ICH region following the publication of the guideline. The framework of rewards, incentives, and obligations for pharmaceutical companies established for the development of pediatric drugs are compared. It appears that the USA and the EU have both developed specific regulations for pediatric drug development while Japan has not. However, in Japan, pharmaceutical companies (PCs) are encouraged to develop pediatric drugs voluntarily, and they may be granted additional months of market exclusivity or the postponement of the drug re-examination deadline. In both the USA and the EU, regulations aimed to increase the number of clinical studies conducted in children, in order to ensure that the necessary data are generated, determining the conditions in which a drug may be authorized to treat the pediatric population. PCs are encouraged to develop pediatric assessment, including pediatric clinical trials, which is described in a pediatric plan submitted to the relevant authorities. A system of rewards for PCs submitting an application for marketing authorization containing pediatric use information has been put in place to cover the additional investment for testing drugs in children. Subject to conditions, these rewards consist in a 6-month extension of the patent or supplementary protection. Regarding the approval for new medicinal products in these two regions, regulations require PCs to include, when it is relevant, a pediatric assessment in their drug research and development plan, which must be approved. Although these regions have implemented the ICH guideline, the regulation differs with respect to the timing of studies in children relative to adults and approval of a pediatric drug development plan. Except for special cases, the pediatric investigation plan in the EU is required to be prepared and submitted to the competent authorities upon availability of adult pharmacokinetic studies (after phase I), which means at an early phase of a new drug development plan. In the USA, the pediatric plan is requested later during the phase II or III trials. In practice, it has become difficult for pharmaceutical industries to develop a practicable clinical program for pediatrics including timelines for studies in children that satisfy both EU and USA authorities. Nevertheless, at an early stage of the development strategy, direct support and advice from competent authorities can be obtained. For the ICH regions, pediatric committees are well-established albeit less structured in Japan. Their roles are to review and assess pediatric plans, to issue recommendations, to advise pharmaceutical companies on the content and format of pediatric data to be methodically collected and analyzed, and to avoid exposing children to unnecessary or redundant clinical trials. This regulatory framework encourages the study and the development of pediatric drugs, but it is still quite difficult to actually measure the impact of the ICH E11 on increasing the number of drugs for pediatric use.
为解决全球市场上儿科适用药物短缺的问题,人用药品注册技术要求国际协调会(ICH)于2000年发布了关于儿科人群药品临床研究的ICH E11指南。该指南极大地改变了儿童药物研发的环境。它是专门为协调、促进和便利在ICH地区(即美利坚合众国、欧盟和日本)开展高质量和符合伦理的儿童临床研究而编写的。本文详细介绍了该指南发布后各ICH地区适用的各种法规。比较了为儿科药物研发为制药公司设立的奖励、激励措施及义务框架。似乎美国和欧盟都制定了儿科药物研发的具体法规,而日本没有。然而,在日本,鼓励制药公司自愿研发儿科药物,它们可能会获得额外的市场独占期或药品再审查期限的延期。在美国和欧盟,相关法规旨在增加针对儿童开展的临床研究数量,以确保生成必要的数据,确定药物可被批准用于治疗儿科人群的条件。鼓励制药公司开展儿科评估,包括儿科临床试验,这在提交给相关当局的儿科计划中有描述。已建立了一项奖励制度,对提交包含儿科用药信息的上市许可申请的制药公司给予奖励,以涵盖在儿童中测试药物的额外投资。在符合条件的情况下,这些奖励包括专利延长6个月或给予补充保护。关于这两个地区新药的批准,法规要求制药公司在相关情况下,在其药物研发计划中纳入儿科评估,且该计划必须获得批准。尽管这些地区已实施ICH指南,但在儿童研究相对于成人研究的时间安排以及儿科药物研发计划的批准方面,法规存在差异。除特殊情况外,欧盟要求在成人药代动力学研究(I期之后)可得时,即新药研发计划的早期阶段,就编制并向主管当局提交儿科研究计划。在美国,儿科计划则在II期或III期试验后期才要求提交。实际上,制药行业很难制定一个可行的儿科临床项目,包括满足欧盟和美国当局要求的儿童研究时间表。然而,在研发战略的早期阶段,可以获得主管当局的直接支持和建议。对于ICH地区而言,儿科委员会已普遍设立,尽管在日本其结构没那么完善。它们的职责是审查和评估儿科计划、发布建议、就需系统收集和分析的儿科数据的内容和格式向制药公司提供建议,并避免让儿童暴露于不必要或多余的临床试验中。这一监管框架鼓励了儿科药物的研究和开发,但实际上仍很难衡量ICH E11对增加儿科用药数量的影响。