Ledger Araminta E W, Borri Marco, Pope Romney J E, Scurr Erica D, Wallace Toni, Richardson Cheryl, Usher Marianne, Allen Steven, Wilson Robin M, Thomas Karen, deSouza Nandita M, Leach Martin O, Schmidt Maria A
Cancer Research - United Kingdom (CR-UK) Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Rd, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
To retrospectively investigate the effect of flip angle (FA) and k-space sampling on the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast sequences.
Five DCE-MRI breast sequences were evaluated (10°, 14°, and 18° FAs; radial or linear k-space sampling), with 7-10 patients in each group (n = 45). All sequences were compliant with current technical breast screening guidelines. Contrast agent (CA) uptake curves were constructed from the right mammary artery for each examination. Maximum relative enhancement, E(max), and time-to-peak enhancement, T(max), were measured and compared between protocols (analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney). For each sequence, calculated values of maximum relative enhancement, E(calc), were derived from the Bloch equations and compared to E(max). Fat suppression performance (residual bright fat and chemical shift artifact) was rated for each examination and compared between sequences (Fisher exact tests).
Significant differences were identified between DCE-MRI sequences. E(max) increased significantly at higher FAs and with linear k-space sampling (P < .0001; P = .001). Radial protocols exhibited greater T(max) than linear protocols at FAs of both 14° (P = .025) and 18° (P < .0001), suggesting artificially flattened uptake curves. Good correlation was observed between E(calc) and E(max) (r = 0.86). Fat suppression failure was more pronounced at an FA of 18° (P = .008).
This retrospective approach is validated as a tool to compare and optimize breast DCE-MRI sequences. Alterations in FA and k-space sampling result in significant differences in CA uptake curve shape which could potentially affect diagnostic interpretation. These results emphasize the need for careful parameter selection and greater standardization of breast DCE-MRI sequences.
回顾性研究翻转角(FA)和k空间采样对动态对比增强(DCE)-磁共振成像(MRI)乳腺序列性能的影响。
评估了五种DCE-MRI乳腺序列(FA分别为10°、14°和18°;径向或线性k空间采样),每组7-10例患者(n = 45)。所有序列均符合当前的乳腺技术筛查指南。每次检查均从右乳动脉构建对比剂(CA)摄取曲线。测量并比较各方案之间的最大相对增强(E(max))和达峰时间(T(max))(方差分析和曼-惠特尼检验)。对于每个序列,从布洛赫方程导出最大相对增强的计算值(E(calc)),并与E(max)进行比较。对每次检查的脂肪抑制性能(残留亮脂肪和化学位移伪影)进行评分,并比较各序列之间的差异(费舍尔精确检验)。
DCE-MRI序列之间存在显著差异。在较高的FA和线性k空间采样时,E(max)显著增加(P < .0001;P = .001)。在14°(P = .025)和18°(P < .0001)的FA时,径向方案的T(max)均高于线性方案,提示摄取曲线人为变平。E(calc)与E(max)之间观察到良好的相关性(r = 0.86)。在18°的FA时,脂肪抑制失败更为明显(P = .008)。
这种回顾性方法被验证为比较和优化乳腺DCE-MRI序列的工具。FA和k空间采样的改变导致CA摄取曲线形状的显著差异,这可能会影响诊断解读。这些结果强调了仔细选择参数和进一步规范乳腺DCE-MRI序列的必要性。