Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55454. E-mail address for A. Van Heest:
Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota, N504 Boynton, 410 Church Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 3;96(17):e151. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00706.
Assessing orthopaedic surgery residency applicants is a complex process. One important applicant characteristic not commonly measured during the interview process is moral behavior, a key component of the guidelines of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for professionalism competency. We sought to determine whether a relationship exists between the results of residency selection interviews, as measured by match rank order, and moral reasoning skills, as measured by the revised version of the Defining Issues Test (DIT-2).
The DIT-2, a psychological tool that has been validated in assessing moral reasoning in >30,000 subjects, was administered to orthopaedic surgery residency candidates on a voluntary basis during their interview day. Data were collected annually from four applicant classes (2009 to 2012) at one institution. Each candidate was interviewed by an orthopaedic faculty team and was ranked comparatively with the other interviewing applicants. The five-part aggregate interview method for ranking applicants for the match list included a focused interview station presenting ethical dilemmas as one part of determining rank order.
One hundred and twenty-four fourth-year medical students interviewing for orthopaedic surgery residency were assessed with the DIT-2. The results from the DIT-2 produced a postconventional score, which correlates with various levels of moral development. Each applicant's postconventional score was then compared with the patient's overall rank order. Applicants had highly variable moral reasoning skills, with no relationship to the final rank list.
Despite a wide range of DIT-2 scores, the interview process did not differentiate applicants based on moral reasoning skills. It remains unclear whether the DIT-2 could (or should) be used as an additional data point to help stratify orthopaedic residency applicants and to predict their performance.
评估骨科住院医师申请人是一个复杂的过程。在面试过程中,一个未被普遍衡量的重要申请人特征是道德行为,这是研究生医学教育认证委员会专业能力准则的一个关键组成部分。我们试图确定住院医师选择面试的结果(通过匹配排名顺序衡量)与道德推理技能之间是否存在关系,道德推理技能通过修订版的确定问题测试(DIT-2)衡量。
DIT-2 是一种心理工具,已在超过 30000 名受试者中验证了道德推理能力,在面试日期间,骨科住院医师申请人自愿接受该测试。该机构从四个申请人班级(2009 年至 2012 年)中每年收集数据。每位候选人都由骨科教师团队进行面试,并与其他面试申请人进行比较排名。用于确定匹配名单申请人排名的五部分综合面试方法包括一个重点面试站,作为确定排名顺序的一部分提出伦理困境。
124 名四年级医学生接受了骨科住院医师的 DIT-2 评估。DIT-2 的结果产生了一个后常规分数,与各种道德发展水平相关。然后将每位申请人的后常规分数与患者的总体排名进行比较。申请人的道德推理技能差异很大,与最终排名无关。
尽管 DIT-2 得分差异很大,但面试过程并未根据道德推理技能区分申请人。目前尚不清楚 DIT-2 是否(或应该)作为额外的数据点用于帮助分层骨科住院医师申请人并预测他们的表现。