Liu Jenny, Modrek Sepideh, Anyanti Jennifer, Nwokolo Ernest, De La Cruz Anna, Schatzkin Eric, Isiguzo Chinwoke, Ujuju Chinazo, Montagu Dominic
Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, Mission Hall: Global Health & Clinical Sciences Building, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 5;14:374. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-374.
To reduce the burden of disease from malaria, innovative approaches are needed to engender behavior change. One unobservable, but fundamental trait-preferences for risk-may influence individuals' willingness to adopt new health technologies. We explore the association of risk preferences with malaria care-seeking behavior and the acceptability of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to inform RDT scale-up plans.
In Oyo State, Nigeria, adult customers purchasing anti-malarial medications at selected drug shops took surveys and received an RDT as they exited. After an initial risk preference assessment via a simple lottery game choice, individuals were given their RDT result and treatment advice, and called four days later to assess treatment adherence. We used bivariable and multivariable regression analysis to assess the association of risk game choices with malaria care-seeking behaviors and RDT acceptability.
Of 448 respondents, 63.2% chose the lottery game with zero variance in expected payout, 27.9% chose the game with low variance, and 8.9% chose the game with high variance. Compared to participants who chose lower variance games, individuals choosing higher variance games were older, less educated, more likely to be male, and were more likely to patronize lower quality drug shops, seek care immediately, and report complete disability due to their illness. In contrast, individuals choosing lower variance games were more likely to follow the correct treatment directions and were more likely to report an increase in their willingness to pay for an RDT compared to other risk groups, our two measures of RDT acceptability. Differences in estimated associations between risk game choices and selected care-seeking behaviors remained after controlling sociodemographic confounders.
The uptake of health diagnostic information in terms of translating the RDT experience into willingness to pay for an RDT and treatment adherence to test results may vary according to risk preferences. Hence, health promotion communications may want to be crafted bearing in mind differences in uptake among people of different risk preferences to encourage wider RDT adoption and more rational malaria treatment. Estimates will serve as the basis for power calculations for an expanded study.
为减轻疟疾带来的疾病负担,需要创新方法来促使行为改变。一个不可观察但基本的特征——风险偏好——可能会影响个体采用新的健康技术的意愿。我们探讨风险偏好与疟疾就医行为以及疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)可接受性之间的关联,以为RDT扩大推广计划提供信息。
在尼日利亚奥约州,在选定药店购买抗疟药物的成年顾客接受调查,并在离开时获得一份RDT检测。通过简单的彩票游戏选择进行初始风险偏好评估后,向个体告知其RDT检测结果和治疗建议,并在四天后致电评估治疗依从性。我们使用双变量和多变量回归分析来评估风险游戏选择与疟疾就医行为和RDT可接受性之间的关联。
在448名受访者中,63.2%选择了预期赔付零方差的彩票游戏,27.9%选择了低方差游戏,8.9%选择了高方差游戏。与选择低方差游戏的参与者相比,选择高方差游戏的个体年龄更大、受教育程度更低、更可能为男性,并且更可能光顾质量较低的药店、立即寻求治疗,并报告因疾病导致完全残疾。相比之下,选择低方差游戏的个体更可能遵循正确的治疗指导,并且与其他风险组相比,更可能报告其购买RDT的支付意愿有所增加,这是我们衡量RDT可接受性的两项指标。在控制社会人口学混杂因素后,风险游戏选择与选定的就医行为之间估计关联的差异仍然存在。
在将RDT体验转化为购买RDT的支付意愿以及对检测结果的治疗依从性方面,对健康诊断信息的接受程度可能因风险偏好而异。因此,在制定健康促进宣传时,可能需要考虑不同风险偏好人群在接受程度上的差异,以鼓励更广泛地采用RDT并进行更合理的疟疾治疗。这些估计将作为扩大研究样本量计算的基础。